s.
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 217 454
CS 206 983-
AUTHOR
Moriarty, Sandra Ernst
TITLE
A Retrospective Analysis of Nostalgia.
PUB DATE
28 Jul 82
NOTE
30p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
Association for Education in Journalism (65th,
Athens, OH, July 25-28, 1982).
EDRS PRICE
MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS
*Advertising; Commercial Art; Editorials; *Fashion
Industry; *Graphic Arts; Layout (Publications); Media
Research; *Motifs; *Periodicalsf *Trend Analysis
IDENTIFIERS
*Nostalgia
ABSTRACT
Prompted by an awareness of nostalgic trends during
the 1960s and 1970s in movies, television programing, fashion,
interior design, and architecture, a study compared such trends in
graphic design in both magazine articles and magazine advertisements.
Specifically, it noted the frequency of occurrence of nostalgia in
the two graphic design areas of artwork and display typography and
compared them with the use of nostalgic motifs in headlines. The
study included 12 magazines representing fashion and design-oriented
publications--both general interest and design trade-
magazines--published from 1959 through'1979, and focused
on a total
of 11,816 advertisements and 2,511 articles. Findings showed that
nostalgic motifs seemed to be used more in designer publications than
in consumer publications and that nostalgic themes
were used more
often in articles than in advertisements. In terms of
use in
headlines, art, or type, graphic design was more likely to display
nostalgic motifs than were the headlines of the articleor
advertisement. More specifically, type was more likely to be the
indicator of nostalgia'than was art. The most favored style for
nostalgic treatment was the Victorian period. The level of nostalgia
also seemed to vary with historical events and periods
as evidenced
by a visible increase in nostalgia during and following periods of
economic recession, as well as following periods of social and civil
unrest. (HOD)
***********************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that
can be made
from the original document.
***********************************************************************
V&sual CommunUaapn
U S DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATION
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER IERIC)
141
his document has been
reproduced as
received 'tons the petson
or organizahon
Orromatmg
M no changes have been made
to mprove
reproduchon qualay
Poh,s of vress or opinions
staled .n this dOcu
men! do not necessarily represent
official NIE
besMon or r.OhCV
A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF
NOSTALGIA
by
Sandra Ernst Moriarty
Department of Advertising
Michigan State University
PERMISSION TO SEPRODUCE
THIS
MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY'
Sandra Ernst Moriarty
TO THE EDUCATIONAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER iERIC)
Presented to the Visual Communication
Division, Association for Education in
Journalism, 1982 Conference, Ohio
University, Athens Ohio, July 28, 1982
ti
A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF NOSTALGIA
During the 1960's and 1970's nostalgic trends have been noted in movies,
television programming, fashion, interior design, and architecture.
Ob-
servers of the graphic design scene also have noted that in the 1960's there
seems to have been an increased use of nostalgia as a major creative stra-
tegy.
(1, 7, 25).
This study compares nostalgic trends in graphic design in both magazine
articles and in magazine advertisements.
Specifically it notes the frequency
of occurrence of nostalgia in the two graphic design areas of artwork and dis-
play typography and compares them with the use of nostalgic motifs in headlines.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
A number of research questions guided the design of this study.
Is there
any-difference in the incidence of nostalgia between designer-oriented pub-
lications and consumer publications?
Where is nostalgia most visible--in the
art, the type or the headline?
Is there any difference in the incidence of
nostalgic themes between advertisements and the editorial side of a magazine.
And finally, in terms of a trend analysis, are there significant dates where
nostalgia will predictably increase?
The following are the working hypotheses that were developed for this
study:
1.
Conventional wisdom suggests design-oriented publications would be more
inclined to follow fads and fashions, and therefore a nostalgic trend
would probably show up first and highest in design-oriented publications.
3
-2
2.
Likewise it is thought that advertising is,more responsive to
changes in fashion and therefore advertising would use nostalgia
themes first and more often than the editorial side of
magazine.
3.
Frankly it was difficult to predict which dimension would be used
as a marker for nostalgia.
It could just as easily be art, type,
or the headline.
For the purpose of this study, it seems likely
that nostalgia will occur first and more frequently in the art since
illustration typically functions to establish mood.
4.
The hypotheses guiding the trend analysis evolve from the question of
whether nostalgia motifs are used more often in periods of crisis
and disenchantment.
These periods could be recessionary times and
periods of public resistance or concern over such issues as
war or
civil rights.
Particular events may incite nostalgia such as the
distribution of major trend setting movies like Bonnie and Clyde and
the preparation for the Bicentennial.
The hypotheses relating to these
benchmark events are as follows:
a.
Nostalgia will increase during and following the officially
identified recessionary periods in 1960, 1970 and 1974 (as
defined by the National Bureau of Economic; Research). (23)
b.
Nostalgic incidences will increase during the period of the
Civil Rights Movement particularly during 1963 and 1964 with
the highly visible sit ins, marches, and voter registration
drives and during the urban riots of 1967 and 1968. (1,3,4,25)
c.
Nostalgia will follow the appearance of a trend setting event
such as the Bonnie and Clyde movie in 1967. (7)
d.
Nostalgia will build during the Vietnam resistance periods and
will be particularly strong during such major crises as the
Kent State protest and shootings in May, 1970.
(1,3,4,25)
e.
Nostalgia will build to a peak preceeding a-planned public
celebraLion such .1s the Bicentennial.
(26)
-3-
Table 1 summarizes the chronology of these major nostalgia*ielated
events.
Table 1 goes near here
THE STUDY
The study included 12 magazines representing fashion and design-oriented
publicationsboth general interest and design trade magazines.
The magazines
analyzed were:
General interest:
New York Times Magazine, Esquire, McCalls, New
Yorker, Holiday, Vogue.
Designer:
Advertising Age, Communication Arts, American Home,
Architectural Record, Art Direction, Print.
The fashion-oriented publications were chosen because it was assumed
they would be leaders in creative trends in graphic design.
The design-
oriented publications included those serving the graphic arts and adver-
tising fields as well as several oriented toward architects and interior
designers.
Once again it was assumed that these publications would be
trendsetters professionally.
The 21-year frame extended from 1959 through 1979.
The study included
a total of 11,816 advertisements, and 2,511 articles.
The year 1959 was used
as rt departure point for several reasons.
First, the 21-y2ar ttme frame is
long enough to allow trend analysis.
Another reason is because, esthetically,
1959 represents the culmination of the acquisitive, materialistic,
technolgic
period identified as the Fifties.(])
It seems to be the end of
a period in more
ways than just the coincidental ending of a decade and, as such, it provides
a benchmark.
cJ
Variables
The dependent variable for this study was frequency of occurrence coded
on three dimensions: Content or theme as expressed in the headline, artaork
or illustration, and display typography.
A pretest found that traces of
nostalgia can show up in any one of the three dimensions without appearing
in the others.
In coding content, there are fairly specific cues and they are usually
expressed in the headline.
Such expressions as "remember when," "it used
to be," "the good old days," "the golden age," and "old fashioned" suggest
that a nostalgic theme may be developing. (21,22,25,26,27)
In art and type
the cues are stylistic.
The art and/or the type may be contemporary creations,
but the way they are used creates a mood or feeling reminiscent of times past.
When coding was completed the frequency of occurrence was converted
to
a percentage using the total number of advertisements or articles in that
particular year as the base.
The total number per year was noted separately
for both general and trade publications.
The percentage represents an index
by year across publication category.
4
Styles
The occurrence was also coded in terms of the style
or period represented.
Some 16 possib1,1 -ategories were identified by studying
articles in nostalgia
and histories of dasign.(1,4,6,8,9,14,18,28)
The results of the pretest
indicated that seven major categories were represented
by nostalgic traces.
As a result of the pretest analysis, some of the categories
were combined in
those cases where tney were originally broken
out of a major category.
Others
were dropped from the study if the occurrence was so infrequent (a
minimum
level of .01) as to be imperceptible in analysis.
-5-
The following are the seven general categories of style
used in this study:
Renaissance (European from 14th to 16th Century),
Colonial, Victorian, Art
Nouveau, Art Deco, International (Including Bauhaus,
Mondrian, Swiss), and
miscellaneous "Old Fashioned", (indeterminate period).
FINDINGS
Period.
Analyzing the data first by style, it is obvious that the
Victorian Period is the most preferred.
Table 2 summarizes all the data
in terms of period for both consumer and designer magazine categories as
well as for advertisements and articles.
In all four categories the leader
in nostalgic influences is the Victorian period.
Table 2 Goes
Near Here
It isalso possible from this same summary taLle to
estimate a frequency
of occurrence of nostalgia in advertisements and articles in both types
of
magazines.
The totals at the bottom of each column represent the
number of
incidents of nostalgic traces but remember that this figure is totaled,across
the three dimensions of art, type and content.
Those totals are given below
with an adjusted percentage:
f
%
Index
Consumer Ads:
694
9.98
3.33
Designer Ads:
628 12.66
4.22
Total Ads:
1322 22.63
7.54
Consumer Articles:
176 11.73 3.91
Designer Articles:
234 22.98
7.66
Total Articles:
410
34.62 11.54
-6
The index is an adjusted percentage computed by dividing by three to
average the occurrences across the three dimensions.
The resulting index
is a more accurate estimate of the amount of nostalgic influences in adver
tisements and articles.
It's obvious that the designer publications
are
more inclined to use nostalgic motifs with an index of 4.2 for advertisements
(compared to 3.3 for consumer ads) and 7.7 for articles (compared to 3.9 for
consumer articles) thus supporting the first hypothesis.
In general, adver
tising with an index of 7.5 was lower in level of nostalgia than the editorial
side with its index of 11.5, which is contrary to the second hypothesis.
Dimension.
In addition to nostalgic period, the data-can also be
summarized in terms of its usage in either headline, art, or type.
Table 3
summarizes this data for both types of magazines.
In advertisements the
leading nostalgic indicator was type with an index of 3.84 for consumer
magazines and 6.21 for designer magazines.
This compares to 3.61 for art in
Table 3 Goes
Near Here
consumer magazines and 5.33 for art in designer magazines.
For both types
of publications, the frequency of occurrence in the headlines was considerably
lower.
The use of nostalgic motifs in art and type in the articles was much
closer with art slightly ahead in frequency.
In consumer articles art had
an index of 4.81 (compared to 4.74 for type) and in designer publications art
was 9.72 (compared to 0.13 for type).
Overall, however, when the frequencies are totaled across magazine
category, the -total index is higher for type than it is for art, the dimension
hypothesized to be highest.
Adding the articles and advertisements together,
the consumer magazines have an index for type of 8.58 (compared to 8.42 for
art) and the designer magazines have an index for type of 15.35 (compared to
15.05) for art. Overall type has a grand total index of 23.93 compared to
23.47 for art and 10.24 for headlines.
Trend Analysis
Table 4 represents the indices of nostalgic motifs throughout the 20-
year period from 1959 to 1979.
The two advertising and editorial columns
are summations_of the indices noted in
those two categories in both consumer
and designer oriented magazines.
(see Tables 5 and 6)
Note:
the index was
computed by figuring the percentage of the total number of ads or articles
observed and then dividing that number by three, since each ad was coded
separately for art, type, and headline.
Cnce the data are summarized beyond
the level of the art, type and headline dimensions, then the frequency is more
accurately described as an index than an incidence.
Table 4 goes near here
Figure 1 depicts the data represented in Table 4.
First the indices
for advertising and editorial use of nostalgia in both consumer and designai:
magazines were plotted, then a solid line was added which represents the
summation of the two categories.
The solid line might be thought of as the
overall nostalgia index for the 20-year period.
An analysis of Figure 1
shows clearly that there is proportionately more nostalgic motifs in editorial
than in advertising.
Figure 1 goes near here
Looking at the solid line it is possible to compare the level of nos-
talgia with the benchmark dates iaentified in the hypotheses.
In all cases
of 1960, 1970, and 1974 the recessionary periods are followed by an increase
in the use of nostalgic themes.
The date of 1967 which is both the distribu-
tion of Bonnie and Clyde and a period of urban riot is clearly marked by a
ti
-8
subsequent increase in the level of nostalgia.
Fin /lly the two years pre-
ceeding the Bicentennial are periods of increased use of nostalgic themes
followed by a parked decrease in the level of nostalgia after 1976.
In terms
of the use of nostalgia by the creative teams developing the advertising and
editorial material in magazines, the level and direction of nostalgia tends
to support the hypotheses.
21fildALlhalysIsLI/Dimensioa and Category. The data in Table 4 and de-
picted in Figure 1 was developed by totaling all of the dimensions individ-
ually in this study.
Tables 5 and 6 present the data broken down by category
and dimension,
Table 5 summarizes the editorial use of nostalgia in both the designer
and consumer categories and includes the breakdowns by dimensions of headline,
art and type.
Table 6 presents the same information for the
use of nostalgia
in advertising.
Tables 5 and 6 go near here
The index values (computed by dividing the total of copy, art, and
type
responses by three) for editorial and advertising nostalgia in both consumer
and designer magazines are depicted in Figures 2 and 3.
Figures 2 and 3 go near here
Editorial nostalgia is the focus of Figure 2 and it is clear from this
illustration that d-signer magazines tend to be higher in their level of
use
of nostalgia and more extreme in their pattern.
It also appears that designer
magazines tend to preceed consumer magazines in the use of nostalgia
as an
editorial strategy.
-9-
Figure 3 looks at advertising and its use of nostalgia.
Essentially the
same pattern appears with the designer magazines using more nostalgia and
dis-
playing more variation in the pattern of use.
Advertising, in contrast to
the editorial side, tends to see more agreement in
use of nostalgia between the
consumer and designer pUblications.
Also the level of nostalgia is lower
over-
all proportionately for advertising then it
was for editorial.
Trend Analysis by Styles.
The data in Table 7 trace the nostalgic
trends
across the 20-year period in terms of dominant styles.
Of the seven design
periods identified in this study, the four highest in frequency
of occurrence
are Art Deco, Art Nouveau, Victorian and Colonial.
Those four periods are
depicted in the Figure 4.
This Figure clearly shows the dominance of the Victorian
period.
It
is also obvious that, while the level
may vary, the overall pattern of highs
and lows, tends to be similar for all four periods.
There are some minor
differences, of course, but the parallels are surprising.
Generally there is a steady increase in the level of nostalgia
from 1959
through 1977-78 with a major decline in frequency in 1979.
After the Bonnie and Clyde movie, Art Deco increases
as would be ex-
pected, but so do the other three period; which suggests nostalgia
is an over-
riding theme rather than just a fascination with
a certain period.
The same
pattern occurs before the Bicentennial in 1976.
Colonial increases but so do
Victoria and Art Nouveau.
Only Art Deco fails to show
any major increase pre-
ceeding the Bicentennial.
-10--
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, nostalgic motifs seem to be used more in desioer publications
than in consumer publications, nostalgia themes are used more often in articles
than in advertisements.
Graphic design is more likely to use nostalgic motifs
than is the headline of the article or
advertisement.
More specifically, type
is more likely to be the indica:or of nostalgia then art.
The most favored
style to be chosen for a nostalgic treatment is the Victc
ian Period.
The level of nostalgia does seem to vary with historical events
and periods.
In fact, there seems to be a visible increase
in nostalgia during and following
periods of economic recession as well as following periods
of social and civil
unrest.
The Bonnie and Clyde movie, which occurred at the same time as a
period
of major civil rights agitation, marked a period of major
increase in the level
of nostalgia.
The same pattern can be observed prior to the Bicentennial.
Americans have traditionally been optimistic, forward
looking, and futur-
istic.
Sir.ce Colonial days this society has been supremely
confident that,
given American inventiveness, the future
will be bright.
If there is an
observable nostalgic trend in mass communication,
does that mean there might
also be a subtle shift in American
attitudes re.ulting in a population that
now tends to find more
of its inspiration in the past rather than in the future?
Mass communication is only a
mirroring medium and this study doesn't attempt
to evaluate public response,
but there might be reason to believe such creative
strategies are both reflecting and reinforcing
this type of attitude change.
If so, and that needs tc be the subject
of additional research, this study has
identified a rather major change in the orientation
of the designers of mass
communication and, one might theorize, the
receivers of the communication as
well.
REFERENCES
1. Brandt, Anthony.
"A Short Natural History of Nostalgia."
Atlantic Monthly.
December, 1978,
pp. 58-63.
Carlinsky, Dan.
"Nostalgia: Who Says its Only for Over-30's?"
Seventeen.
July 1971,
pp. 114-115, 152.
3 Clarke, Gerald.
"The Meaning of Nostalgia:
A Time Essay."
Time. May, 1971,
p. 77.
4. Davis, Fred. Yearning for Yesterday:
A Sociology of Nostalgia.
New York:
The Free Press, 1979.
5- Denman, Frank.
The Shaping of Our Alphabet.
New York:
Alfred A. Knopf,
1955.
6. deVried, Leonard.
Victorian Advertisements_
New York:
J.P. Lippincott,
1968.
7. Ernst, Sandra B. "Advertising Design in the 70's:"
Sharing for Understanding
(Conference Proceedings).
American Academy of, Advertising Annual
Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1977.
8. Ferebee, Ann.
A History of Design from the Victorian Era to the Present.
New York:
Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970.
9. Fox, Martin.
"Look Out!
Here Come the Forties."
Print.
March/April, 1971,
pp. 23-26.
10. Gloag, John.
Victorian Taste.
London:
Adam and Charles Black, 1962.
11. Gray, Nicolette. Nineteenth Century Ornamented Types and Title pages.
London:
Faber & Faber Ltd., 1975.
12. Gress, Edmund G.
Fashions in American Typography 1780-1930.
New York:
Harpers and Brothers, 1931.
1
13. Hamil, A.D.F. A History of 0 nament:
Renaissance and Modern.
Vol. II,
New York: The Century Co., 1923.
14, Hayes, Harold T.P.
"The Push Pin Conspiracy."
The New York Times Magazine.
March 6, 1977, pp. 19-22.
15: Kelly, Rob Boy.
American Woodape 1828-1900.
New York:
Van Nostrand
Reinhold Co., 1969.
16. Lawson, Alexander.
Printing Types: An Introduction.
Boston:
Beacon Press,
1971.
17. Merriman, Frank.
ATA Tyke Comparison Book.
New York:
American Typographycal
Association, 1965.
REFERENCES, CONT'D.
18.
Miller, Douglas T. and Marion Nowak.
The Fifties:
The Way We Really
Were. New York:
Doubleday and Co.
1977.
19. Morrison, Stanley.
Type Designs of the Past and Present.
London:
The
Fleuron Ltd., 1926.
20. McMullen, Roy.
"That Rose-Colored Rearview Mirror."
Saturday Review.
October 2, 1976, pp. 22-23.
21.
Newsweek. "Nostalgia."
December 28, 1970, pp 34-38.
22.
Perry, Ann.
Renaissance Revival Victorian Furniture.
Grand Rapids, MI:
Grand Rapids Art Museum, 1976.
23. University of Michigan Survey Research Center.
"Measure of National
Economic Activity."
Economic Outlook USA.
Summer, 1981.
24.
Updike, Daniel Berkeley. Printing Types:
Their History? Forms and Use.
Vol. II, 2nd ed. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1951.
25.
U.S. News and World Report.
"Why the Craze for the 'Good Old Days.'"
Nov. 12, 1973, pp. 72-76.
26.
U.S. News and World Report.
"There's Gold in That Nostalgia."
Oct.11, 1976,
pp. 49-50.
27.
U.S. News and World Report. "The 'Good Old Days'--or Were They?"
Feb. 10,
1975, pp. 28-31.
28.
Warren, Geoffrey.
Art Nouveau. London:
Octopus Books Ltd., 1972.
29. Zapf, Hermann.
About Alphabets:
Some Marginal Notes on Type Design.
Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1970.
-1
TABLE 1
NOSTALGIA BENCHMARKS
59
60
Recession:
last 3 quarters
61
62
63
641
Civil Rights:
Sit ins, Marches, Voter Registration
65
66
Bonnie and Clyde
Civil Rights: Urban Riots
68
69
70] Recession:
Last quarter of 69, first 3 quarters of 70
71
72
73
.
74 Recession:
Last quarter of 73, all of 74 and into the first
.
quarter of 75
75
76]
[77
78
79
Bicentennial
t
TABLE 2
NOSTALGIC MOTIFS BY PERIOD
PERIOD
ADVERTISEMENTS
ARTICLES.
CONSUMER
n=6972
f %
DESIGNER
n=4844
f
TOTAL
CONSUMER
n=1497
f
DESIGNER
n=1019
%
TOTAL
DECO
43
.62
57 1.18
1.80
30
2.01 15 1.48
3.49
INTERNATIONAL
6
:08
44 .91
.99
1
.07
8 .78
.85
NOUVEAU
62
.89
62
1.28
2.17
14
.93
33
3.24
4.17
VICTORIAN
258
3.70
295 6.10
9.80 91 6.06
118 11.58 17.64
COLONIAL
145
2.08
86
1.47 3.55
21 1.39 27
2.66
4.05
RENAISSANCE
86
1.24
51
1.05
2.29
17
1.14
24
2.36
3.41
OLD-FASHIONED
94
1.36
33 .67
2.03 2
.13
9
.88
1.01
TOTALS
694
9.98
628 12.66
22.63
176
11.73 234 22.98
34.62
.
CONSUMER
HEAD
MAGAZINES
f
DECO
INTNTL.
NOUV.
VICT:
COLON.
RENSC.
O.F.
SUBTOTAL
II.
DESIGNER
MAGAZINES
DECO
INTNTL.
NOUV.
VICT.
COLON.
RENSC.
O.F.
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
ADVERTISEMENTS
n=6972)
AR1
TYPE
11
.16
1
.01
9
.13
47
.67
40
.57
33
.48
33
.48
174 2.50
14
.20
5
-.07
32
.46
78
1.12
59 .85
42
.60
22
.i2
252
3.61
TABLE 3
NOSTALGIC MOTIFS BY DIMENSION
ARTICLES (n=1497)
18
.26
0 0
21
.30
133
1.91
46
.66
11
.16
39
.56
268
3.84
HEAD
ART
f
TYPE
HEAD
f
%
4 .27
12 .80 14 .94
15 .43
0
0
1
.07
0
0
1 .01
4 .27
6 .40
4 .26
13
.40
10 .66
36 2.40
45
3.00 57
1.33
8
.53 8 .53
5 .33 48
1.10
7
.47 9 .60
1
.07 40 .95
0 0
0
0
2 .13
33
.48
33
2.20
72 4.81
71
4.74
207
4.70
TOTAL_
ART
f
%
26
1.00
6
.14
38
.186
114
3.52
67 1.38
51
1.20
22 .32
324
8.42
TYPE
f
32 1.20
0 0
25 .56
178 4.91
51
.99
12 .23
41 ,.69
339
8.58
ADVERTISEMENTS (n=4844)
ARTICLES (n=1019) TOTAL
1
.02
2
.04
4
.08
25
.52
20
.41
8
.16
9
.18
69 1.42
243 3.92
30
.62
26
.54
29 .60
105
2.17
37
.76
26 .54
5
.10
258 5.33
510
8.94
26
.54
0 0
8
.79
16
.33
1 .10
4
.39
29
.60
3 .29
18 1.77
165
3.41
18 1.77
46 4.51
29
.60 8 .79
12 1.18
17
.35 7 .69
11
1.08
19
.39 5 .49 0 0
301
6.21 42 4.12 99
9.72
569 10.05
75 6.32 171 14.53
7
.69
3
.29
12
1.18
54 5.30
7
.69
6
.59
4 ..39
93
9.13
164 13.87
*1 .02
3
.14
7 .37
43
2.29
28
1.20
15
.85
14
.67
111 5.54
318 10.24
38
1.41
30
.93
47 2.37
151
6.68
49
1.94
37
1.62
5
.10
357
15.05
681 23.47
1
33 1.23
19 .62
41 1.78
219 8.71
36 1.29
23
.94
23 .78
394 15.35
733 .23.93
TABLE 4
LEVELS OF NOSTALGIA
Advertising Editorial
Total
59
.05 .03
.08
60
'.07 .07
.14
61 .05
.09
.14
62 .06
.12
.18
63 .08 .08
.16
64
.09
.01
.10
65
.14
.06
.20
66 .03
.08
.11
67 .08
.02
.10
68 .06
.16
.22
69
.06
.14
.20
70
.08
.08
.16
71
.10
.16
.26
72
.15
.20
.35
73
.07
.15
.22
74
.10 .15
.25
75 .10
.27
.37
76
.18
.20
.38
77
.10 .20
.30
78
.14
.19
.33
79
.11
.10
.21
cb
TABLES
EDITORIAL NOSTALGIA
Designer Mags
Consumer Mags
Copy
Art
Type Index Copy
Art Type
Index
59 0
0
0
0
.03
.045 0
.03
60
.044 .092 .044.
.06 .013
.013 0
.01
61
.072
.096
.072
.08 0
.014
.014
.01
62 .078
.129
.052
.09
.028
.041 .027
.03
63
.051
.068
.068
.06 .014 .028
.014
.02
64 0
.016
.016
.01 0
0 0
0
65 .019
.057
.058
.05
0
.016
0
.01
66 .033
.063
.028 .04 .045
.045
.015
.04
67 0 0
0 0
.017
.017 .017
.02
68
.044 .109
.153 .10
.01
.04 .121
.06
69 .073 .171
.046 .10
.032 .032
.048
.04
70
.019
.019
.056
.03
.041
.068 .041
.05
71 .044 .31
.088
.08
.034
.136 .083
.08
72 .025
.025 .05
.18
0
.032
.032
.02
73 .015
.151
.181
.12
.014
.041
.027
.03
74
.042
.084
.146 .09
.026
.089
.064.
.06
75 .105
.383
.277
.26 .072
.12
.108
.01
76 .056
.028
.084
.06 .092
.211
.118
.14
77
.081
.131
.15 .12
.044
.088 .122
.08
78
.157
.259 .173 .16 .01
.04
.04
.03
79
-
.116
.029
.05
0
.094
.062
.05
'ilWEEMEMENEE=1=======2=!......... ---assasesaalanaarimammisdr......
TABLE 6
ADVERTISING NOSTALGIA
Designer Nags
Consumer Nags
Copy Art Type
Index
Copy
Art
Type Index
59 0
.049
.033
.03
.009 .021
.023
.02
60 .033
.017
.044 .03 .043
.054
.019
.04
61
.01
.033
.023
.02
.031
.039 .028
.03
62 .004 .033
.022 .02 .023
.038
.028
.03
63
0 .028 .024 .04 .066
.031
.019
.04
64 .005
.134
.029
.06 .024
.026
.037
.03
65
0 .096 .23 .11
.028
.043
.025
.03
66
.003 .03 .06 .03
.008
.032
.043
.03
67 .006
.058 .063 .04
.073
.023
.032
.04
68 .021
.024
.036 .03
.009
.024
.049
.03
69 .004 .037 .033 .03
.02
.034
.026
.03
70
.004
.054
.069 .04
.029
.044
.047
.04
71
.065
.035 .085
.06
.015
.029
.077
.04
72 .039
.092
.133 .09
.05
.059
.065
.06
73 .014
.088 .011 .04
.076
.034 .044
.03
74 .015
.048 .042 .04
.08
.052
.044
.06
75
.018
.336
.0154 .04
.044
.069
.068
.06
76
.069
.13 .152 .12 .059
.042 .082
.06
77 .029
.073
.1
.07
.019
.041
.031
.03
78
.021 .094 .171 .10 .018
.033 .054
.04
79 .01
.067 .035
.04 .0. ,
.061
.135
.07
TABLE 7
EDITORIAL AND ADVERTISING COMBINED
Deco
Nouveau
Victorian
Colonial
59
0
.002
.031
.012
60 0
.029
.058
.007
61
.002 0
.057
.018
62
0 .021
.056
.047
63
0
0
.077
.005
64
0 0
.034
.006
65
.002
.035
.129
.009
66
.004
.028
.080
.016
67
.001
.007
.050
.009
68
.016 .035
.112
.015
69 .028
.088 .016
.037
70 .004
.016
.061
.014
71 .007
.039
.110
.026
72
.019
.015
.088
.033
73
.052 .029
.112
.025
74
.037
.031
.099
.029
75
.039
.074
.207
.081
76
.038
.008
.152
.055
77
.055
.02
.118
.033
78
.029
.038
.088
.097
79 .037
.043
.03
.009
0-1
40.
39-
38.
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30.
29.
, 28.
27..
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
Advertising
Editorial
Total
.0
cm.
7.
6.
5
4.
3
2
1
A
/
i
,
%
.
I
/
%
t
/
.
t
.
t
/
T.
I .
t ...,
I
..-.1,
.
.
I
...
.
Nit
I :
.1.
S
.
I
%
%
I
s
t
.
I
,
.
I
.
:
A
t
.
.
s
.
I
I
.
.
.
1/1
.
%
I
%
I
0
I
%
I
% 1
.
.."
%
0
i
% 1
..
%
I
V.
% g
II
\
I
on
. 4 . .1
t .
..
...
/4 %
l
%
II
,
%
1
,..
%
I
.
%
/
f
,
.
% :
.
.% % \I
I
I
S.
Is
t
s
%
t
I
I
/
t
. ,
ii,
,
V
IIPS
0
.......01.,...
......
59
60
6t
42
0 `)
.-.F--1- To 1.
Total Inc;r!^nce of No:.tl!jia by Year
63 A is 66 67 68 69
k
7
h
h
7
A
I)
I
0.. 1
76
77 71
25
19
14/
13
12
11
9
4
31
2_t
A
I
I
I
/
1
I
if\
\
A
il
\
/
k
I
\..,-
r
,
1
\
I
r
/
/ --,,.
.
1
$.-
I
i
1
/
\
\
/
II/
.
/
_..../
\
'I
S
2
In
Figure 2:
'A Comparison of Editorial
Nostalgia in
Designer and Consumer Magazines
Art CeCO
Art Nouveau
Victorian
Colonial
19
17
16
A
/t
I I
I
s
I
I
14
/
I
I
/
/
s
13
I
i
A
r
i t
/
I
I
I
i
;
12
1 s
/
1
/
1
11
t t
i \
i
/
1
1
s
7%
)`
I
I
/ %
I
No
1
\
/
1
/
I
\
/
% ..
/
\
/
t
s
/
v
..,
/
1
/
9.
/
/
s
1,
.
I
1
8
I
s
r
.
I /
7.
,/ t
I
/
%
%
/
/
.
I /
.
1 /
. 1
I
i
I
.
1
/
/
t
.
i
II
\
II
.
Il
I
6
-//
I
1
.
: 1/
'
r
I
I
i
.
4.,
.
.
.
..., -
/
N 1
.
.
/
1
/
V
/
1 I
4
/
1
I
s
.
z$L'i,
/
1
..
I
.
s 1
.4.
Iii..11/re s
/
.
:1
0
3
/
I I
P
%1
.
.
1
.
,
. .
.
. ./....
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
*
.
.4*
.
.
. .
.
%%%%%% %%%%
.
.%
IuLt 1 ok %%%
S
% 'off %%%%%% I tin foto frI
o
t
I
r
ttiti,s
.
1
2
z
i
il
i !" :
15
fI
Figure 4:
'Total Incidence of Nostalgia by Period and by Year
a) (j
r 1
gP
te t-45
g g