Michigan.gov/EGLE 800-662-9278 Rev. 2/2024
SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION
Minimum Requirements
A reliable inventory of potable water service line materials is important for service line replacement
planning, effective asset management, and notification of citizens served by lead service lines.
Reliability and completeness of service line records can vary both across and within water supplies;
therefore, it is important that supplies take steps to verify service line materials and records. Water
supplies are not expected to physically verify every service line, but rather a statistically sound
subset. To effectively evaluate the accuracy of service line records and/or predict service line
materials, a representative, uniformly random number of service lines must be physically verified.
Information gathered through random material verification processes provides:
A verified estimate of the proportion of each service line material and material configuration
across the distribution system, providing a sound basis for planning service line replacement
and notification efforts.
A basis for evaluating the reliability of existing service line material records and identifying
areas where additional physical verification or information may be needed. For water
supplies with high confidence in existing records, this may serve to demonstrate that
records are, in fact, reliable.
A baseline data set for predicting materials at other locations (in combination with other
information).
This random material verification process does NOT provide:
The service line material configuration of every building served; or
The extent to which specific areas of the distribution system may differ from the system-wide
average occurrence rate of each service line material.
Verification Exceptions:
A water supply may avoid the material verification process if all potable water service lines
within the water supply meet the strict definition of “known” described below.
Water supplies may exclude from this verification service lines four inches or more in
diameter. Guidance for addressing these service lines as part of the Complete Distribution
System Materials Inventory (CDSMI) will be provided separately.
Timing of Verification:
It is recommended that water supplies conduct this verification early enough in the CDSMI process
to allow sufficient time for additional work, as needed, before the CDSMI is due to the Michigan
Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) by October 16, 2024. Consider
completing this verification by the end of 2022, thereby allowing an additional two years to
undertake any additional activities that may be necessary to complete the inventory.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
- 2 -
Random Material Verification Process
To evaluate the accuracy of potable water service line records and/or predict service line materials,
a statistically sound, uniformly random number of service lines should be physically verified. Some
supplies have already conducted recent physical verifications and/or have controls in place that
dictate service line materials, resulting in a very high level of confidence in the materials of some
service lines. In recognition of this, the following protocol requires random verification of only those
service lines of “unknown” material.
For the purpose of this verification, a conservative approach is used to determine when a service
line’s material can be characterized as “known” and be excluded from the verification process.
To be considered “known,” and therefore excluded from the pool of sites from which a random
sample will be drawn, a service line must meet criteria 1 or 2 below:
1. The service line was recently
1
physically verified and all of the following apply:
ALL points, as defined in Step 5 below, were recently physically verified;
The physical verification was well documented as to the material at each point; AND
The water supply has not observed deviations from these records during operations and
maintenance.
OR
2. Ordinances or controls were in place and all of the following apply:
Ordinances
2
or other controls
3
were in place at the time the service line was installed
specifying materials used in service line construction AND
The water supply has not observed deviations from these ordinance(s) or control(s) during
operations and maintenance.
1
“Recently” in this context is water supply-specific. Supplies must define recent to include a time after which its
records have been demonstrated to be reliable. No records prior to 1989 may be considered recent for the
purpose of this portion of the verification process. The use of lead service lines was officially prohibited in
Michigan in 1988; therefore, the health risk due to unreliable records is higher before this date. This does not
mean service line records prior to 1989 have no value. They may have great value in finalizing a system’s CDSMI,
but they cannot be used to exclude a location from the pool of sites from which random sites are selected for this
verification.
2
An ordinance is defined as: A law, statute, or regulation enacted by a municipal corporation. An ordinance is
a law passed by a municipal government. A municipality, such as a city, town, village, or borough, is a political
subdivision of a state within which a municipal corporation has been established to provide local government to
a population in a defined area.
3
A control, for the purposes of this guidance, is defined as: A general set of approved specifications or binding
construction documentation that explicitly demonstrates that there were controls in place dictating the material
usage in all public and private portions of a service line. Any controls must first have been explicitly adopted by the
water system or directly defined for each blueprint used in construction.
- 3 -
Any service line that does not meet one of the two criteria above is considered “unknown” for
the purpose of this verification process and should be included in the list of locations from which
a set of sites will be uniformly randomly selected for verification.
NOTES:
Service lines four inches or more in diameter may be excluded from the verification process.
This definition of “known” and the three- or four-point verification process described in the
following Step 5 are specific to this baseline verification process and may not apply to
other aspects of the CDSMI. Further guidance on completing the rest of the CDSMI will be
provided at a later date.
Material Verification Process Steps
Step 1: Identify all potable water service lines of “unknown” material.
Identify all potable water service lines of “unknown” material (i.e., those not meeting the criteria of
“known” provided above). Determine the total number of these “unknown” service lines. Service
lines four or more inches in diameter may be excluded from this verification process.
Note: For the purpose of this verification process, assumed service line materials cannot be used to
classify a service line as “known.”
Step 2: Identify how many service lines should be physically verified.
Water supplies with fewer than 1,500 “unknown” service lines must physically verify at least
20 percent of the total number of “unknown” lines.
Water supplies with 1,500 or more “unknown” service lines must physically verify enough
lines to reach a 95 percent confidence level. See Appendix A to determine the number of
service lines requiring verification.
Step 3: Randomly select service lines for physical verification.
From the list of “unknown” service lines identified in Step 1, randomly select enough service lines
to at least meet the number requiring physical verification as determined in Step 2. Selection must
be uniformly random and not selected based on any specific criteria which can introduce bias. In
other words, each “unknown” service line must have an equal chance of being chosen for
verification. See Appendix B for an easy way to generate a uniformly random set of locations for
verification.
Note: It may be tempting to introduce a “logic” to the site selection process, such as selecting
within periods of construction or targeting portions of town. However, doing so can unintentionally
bias the data set so use a truly random selection method such as the one described in Appendix B.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
- 4 -
Step 4: Create a tool for tracking records and materials during verification.
Create a spreadsheet (or other tracking mechanism) containing the randomly selected locations
identified in Step 3. Include columns or fields for tracking both existing records and results of the
physical verification. In this step, enter currently available information about service line materials
based on pre-verification records. See Appendix C for an example spreadsheet.
Step 5: Conduct three- or four- point physical verification.
Three or four points of physical verification are required for each service line. Physical verification
methods may include potholing (by a variety of methods including hydro-vac, air-knifing, hand
digging, etc.), trenching, televising, and in-home inspections. Always record the actual material
observed for each point described below, even if the material was as expected. Do not use “non-
lead” to describe the material.
Each service line requiring verification must have the following three or four points physically
verified (numeric bullets refer to the numbered location in the illustration above):
1. Interior portion of the service line up to the first shutoff valve or 18 inches inside the building,
whichever is shorter.
2. Curb stop to building, a minimum of 18 inches from the curb stop.
3. Main to curb stop, a minimum of 18 inches from the curb stop.
4. Lead connector (gooseneck/pigtail), if present. In this context, a gooseneck or pigtail is a
short section of material, typically not exceeding two feet, which can be bent and used for
connection between a rigid fitting (corporation stop) and the service line piping.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
- 5 -
If a lead connector is present, a water supply must EITHER:
Conduct a physical verification.
OR
Have a control that was in place demonstrating they were never used, OR
Assume locations with galvanized service lines between the main and curb stop contain
(or previously contained) a lead connector. If a water supply makes this assumption, they
may skip physical verification of the gooseneck material.
Note: Unless assuming the current or previous presence of a lead gooseneck, most water
supplies with galvanized service lines between the main and curb stop must physically verify
the connector material.
Step 6: Record results of physical verification in the spreadsheet created in Step 4.
In the spreadsheet or tracking tool created in Step 4, enter the service line material observed at
each point of the service line during the physical verification conducted in Step 5. Always record the
actual material observed, such as lead, copper, plastic, galvanized steel, or other. Do not use “non-
lead.”
Step 7: Evaluate results of physical verification.
This representative, uniformly random sample of service line materials should be, with a high
probability, representative of service line materials from the portion(s) of the system from which the
random set was selected. You can use this information to assess the reliability of your existing
records and make sound assessments/decisions as you complete a system-wide inventory.
Assess Reliability of Existing Records:
Compare the historical records of your randomly selected sites with the new physically verified
materials for those sites to evaluate the reliability of your water supply’s historical records. For
example, what percent of the time did the physical verification match the historical records? If
historical records are found to be unreliable, additional physical verification may be necessary.
Predict Service Line Materials at Other Locations:
The results of this verification, in combination with other available information, can be used to
predict service line materials at other sites. Water supplies may need assistance with this
process. Additional information will be provided in a separate guidance document.
Retain Verification Records
Create, compile, and retain documentation of your verification efforts. You may be asked by EGLE
to produce or submit these records.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
- 6 -
Beyond This Verification
This is not the end of the CDSMI process. As noted in Step 7, additional verification may be
necessary if records are found to be unreliable, additional work may be needed to build-out the
inventory, notifications to residents may be necessary, reporting to EGLE will be required, etc.
Additional guidance on these steps will be provided later.
Lead Service Line Notification Reminder:
Written notification must be provided to the owner and occupant(s) of any building with a service
line known, or assumed, to contain lead in any portion.
This guidance was created in collaboration with the University of Michigan and with consideration of the
ASDWA/BlueConduit white paper “Principles of Data Science for Lead Service Line Inventories and
Replacement Programs (www.asdwa.org/2020/09/25/asdwa-blueconduit-release-white-paper-on-lsl-data-
methods.)
EGLE does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status,
disability, political beliefs, height, weight, genetic information, or sexual orientation in the administration of
any of its programs or activitie
s, and prohibits intimidation and retaliation, as required by applicable laws
and regulations.
To request this material in an alternate format, contact EGLE-Accessibility@Michigan.gov or 800-662-9278.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
A - 1
Appendix A:
Minimum Number of Service Lines Requiring Physical Verification
Number of “Unknown”
Service Lines*
Number to Physically
Verify
Fewer than 1,500 20% of “unknown” lines
1,500
306
1,600
310
1,700
314
1,800
317
1,900
320
2,000
322
2,200
327
2,400
331
2,600
335
2,800
338
3,000
341
3,500
346
4,000
351
4,500
354
5,000
357
6,000
361
7,000
364
8,000
367
9,000
368
10,000
370
15,000
375
20,000
377
30,000
379
40,000
381
60,000
382
90,000
383
225,000 or more
384
* For the purposes of this verification process, this represents the number
of service lines that do
NOT meet the criteria for “known” service lines
described at the beginning of this document. If the number of
“unknowns” falls between two values on the chart, either interpolate or
round up to the higher number.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
A - 1
Appendix B:
Generating a Uniformly Random Set of Services Lines for Verification
A spreadsheet (such as Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets) can be used to generate a uniformly
random set of “unknown” locations for verification using the following steps:
1. In the first column of a spreadsheet, list every unique service location of “unknown”
material. They can be listed by address, service line ID, or other identification method.
2. In the second column, generate uniformly random numbers, so that each service line is
associated with a randomly generated number, using the following steps:
a. Enter the following formula in the second column: =RAND( )
b. Put the ‘=RAND( )’ formula next to each location.
c. This generates a number between 0 and 1 for each location.
d. Then select the column with the random values and use the spreadsheet’s “Copy”
feature.
e. Then use the “Paste Special” option to “Paste Values Only” in the same column that
you have already selected. This will ensure your random numbers remain static.
f. Then use the “Sort” feature to list the randomly generated numbers from lowest to
highest. If the “Sort Warning” appears, select “Expand the selection,” then “Sort.”
3. Select only the top N homes, where N is the number requiring verification. For example, if
you need to verify 20 locations, select the first 20 locations on the list. These are the 20
uniformly random locations requiring verification.
Here is a short online tutorial for generating random samples in Microsoft Excel. The same formulas
and method work for Google Sheets.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
C - 2
Appendix C:
Example Field Verification Tracking Spreadsheet
Service Line ID &
Location
Service Line Material
Based on HISTORICAL RECORDS
Service Line Material
Based on FIELD VERIFICATION
Parcel ID/
Service
Line ID
Address
Connector
Historical
Record
Main-to-
Curbstop
Historical
Record
Curbstop-
to-Home
Interior
(18or 1
st
shutoff)
Date of
Historical
Record
Type of
Record
Year
Built
Connector
(gooseneck)
Verified
Material
Main-to-
Curbstop
Verified
Material
Curbstop-
to-Home
Interior
(18” or 1
st
shutoff)
Date
Verified
Method
1234567
23 Main St
Copper
Copper
Unknown
1958
NA
Copper
Copper
Copper
1/2/2020
Hydrovac
1234567
60 1st Ave
Copper
Copper
Unknown
12/1/1956
Note
1951
NA
Copper
Copper
Copper
12/6/2019
Hydrovac
1234567
12 Michigan
Unknown
Copper
Copper
1927
Lead
Galvanize
Lead
Lead
6/20/2020
Excavation
1234567
34 2nd Ave
Galvanize
Copper
Copper
NA
Copper
Copper
Copper
11/22/202
Hydrovac
1234567
941 W Main
Copper
Copper
Copper
3/15/1986
Permit
1954
NA
Copper
Copper
Copper
11/13/201
Hydrovac
1234567
24 North St
Galvanize
Copper
Copper
1935
Lead
Galvanize
Lead
Lead
10/25/202
Excavation
1234568
26 Grand
Unknown
Copper
Unknown
6/15/1929
Note
1926
NA
Copper
Lead
Copper
11/28/201
Excavation
1234568
13 24th St
Galvanize
Copper
Unknown
1/11/1952
Note
1871
NA
Lead
Galvanize
Galvanized
5/25/2020
Hydrovac
NOTE: This table is only an example. Water supplies must document the location, existing records (if available), and findings of the physical
verification. Water supplies should consider adding any additional columns that will capture data useful to the verification process or
completion of the CDSMI.
MINIMUM SERVICE LINE MATERIAL VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS