INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
2019
IRC:105-2019
(The Official amendments to this document would be published by
the IRC in its periodical, ‘Indian Highways’ which shall be
considered as effective and as part of the Code/Guidelines/Manual,
etc. from the date specified therein)
SPECIFICATIONS FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS
MACADAM AND BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
FOR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
(First Revision)
IRC:105-2019
SPECIFICATIONS FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS
MACADAM AND BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
FOR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
(First Revision)
Published by:
INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
Kama Koti Marg,
Sector-6, R.K. Puram,
New Delhi-110 022
DECEMBER, 2019
Price : ` 400/-
(Plus Packing & Postage)
IRC:105-2019
First Published : March, 1988
First Revision : December, 2019
(All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication shall be reproduced,
translated or transmitted in any form or by any means without the
permission of the Indian Roads Congress)
Printed at India Offset Press, Delhi - 110 064
1100 Copies
IRC:105-2019
CONTENTS
S. No. Description Page No.
Personnel of the Highways Specications and Standards Committee i-ii
Abbreviations iii
1. Introduction 1
2. Scope 2
3. Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM) and Dense Asphaltic Concrete (DAC) 3
3.1 Material 3
3.2 Mix Requirements 9
3.3 Construction Operations 11
3.4 Controls 15
Annexure I Outline of AASHTO T 283, “Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to
Moisture-Induced Damage” 18
Annexure II Outline of ASTM D 2041, “Theoretical Maximum Specic Gravity and
Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures” 21
IRC:105-2019
i
PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS
AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE
(As on 20.07.2019)
1 Pandey, I.K.
(Convenor)
Director General (Road Development) & Special Secretary to Govt. of India,
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi
2 Balakrishna, Y.
(Co-Convenor)
Additional Director General, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,
New Delhi
3 Kumar, Sanjeev
(Member Secretary)
Chief Engineer (R) S, R & T, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,
New Delhi
Members
4 Behera, Bijan Kumar Engineer-in-Chief (Civil) (Retd.), Odisha
5 Bose, Dr. Sunil Head (Retd.), FP Division, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi
6 Chandra, Dr. Satish Director, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi
7 Gupta, D.P. DG(RD) & AS (Retd.), Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi
8 Jain, R.K. Chief Engineer (Retd.), PWD Haryana
9 Kapila, K.K. Chairman & Managing Director, ICT Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
10 Kukrety, B.P. Associate Director, CEG Ltd., New Delhi
11 Kumar, Dr. Mahesh Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.), PWD (B&R) Haryana
12 Lal, Chaman Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.), PWD Haryana
13 Meena, H.L. Secretary (Retd.), PWD Rajasthan
14 Nashikkar, J.T. Secretary (Retd.), PWD Maharashtra
15 Nirmal, S.K. Secretary General, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi
16 Parida, Prof. (Dr.) M. Deputy Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
17 Patel, S.I. Secretary (Retd.), PWD (Roads and Buildings) Gujarat
18 Prasad, R. Jai Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.), PWD & Bangalore Mahanagar Palike, Karnataka
19 Rawat, M.S. Executive Director, AECOM India Pvt. Ltd.
20 Reddy, Dr. K.S. Krishna Secretary, Public Works, Ports & Inland Water Transport Department,
Karnataka
21 Reddy, I.G. Engineer-in-Chief (NH, CRF & Buildings), PWD Hyderabad
22 Reddy, Prof. (Dr.) K.S. Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
23 Sharma, S.C. DG(RD) & AS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi
24 Shrivastava, A.K. Additional Director General (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and
Highways, New Delhi
25 Singh, Nirmaljit DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi
26 Sinha, A.V. DG(RD) & SS (Retd.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi
IRC:105-2019
ii
27 The Chief Engineer
(Basar, Toli)
PWD Arunachal Pradesh
28
The Addl. DGBR (North-West)
(Kumar, Anil)
Border Roads Organisation, New Delhi
29 The Director (Tech.)
(Pradhan, B.C.)
National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency, New Delhi
30 The General Manager
(Projects) (Retd.)
(Kaul, Satish)
National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation, New Delhi
31 The JICA Expert
(Kitayama, Michiya)
Japan International Cooperation Agency, New Delhi
32 The Member (Projects)
(Pandey, R.K.)
National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi
33 The Professor
(Chakroborty, Dr. Partha)
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
34 The Secretary
(Vasava, S.B.)
Roads and Buildings Department, Gujarat
35 The Secretary (Roads)
(Joshi, C.P.)
PWD Maharashtra
36 The Secretary (Tech.)
(Tickoo, Bimal) (Retd.)
Roads and Buildings Department, Jammu & Kashmir
37 The Special Director
General (Retd.)
(Bansal, M.C.)
CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
38 Venkatesha, M.C. Consultant
39 Wasson, Ashok Member (Tech.) (Retd.), National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi
Corresponding Members
1 Jaigopal, R.K. MD, Struct Geotech Research Laboratories (P) Ltd., Bengaluru
2 Justo, Prof. (Dr.) C.E.G. Professor (Retd.), Emeritus (Expired in June, 2019)
3 Veeraragavan, Prof. (Dr.) A. Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Ex-Ofcio Members
1 President,
Indian Roads Congress
(Basar, Toli), Chief Engineer, PWD Arunachal Pradesh
2 Director General (Road
Development) & Special
Secretary to Govt. of India
(Pandey, I.K.), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi
3 Secretary General,
Indian Roads Congress
Nirmal, Sanjay Kumar
IRC:105-2019
iii
ABBREVIATIONS
All abbreviations are explained where they occur rst. Some of these are:
AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Ofcials
ASTM - American Society of Testing and Materials
BC - Bituminous Concrete
BIS - Bureau of Indian Standards
DAC - Dense Asphaltic Concrete
DBM - Dense Bituminous Macadam
HMA - Hot Mix Asphalt
IRC - Indian Roads Congress
ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organisation
IMD - India Meteorological Department
MORTH - Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
NMAS - Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size
PMB - Polymer Modied Bitumen
SAMI - Stress Absorbing Membranes Interlayer
SMA - Stone Matrix Asphalt
VG - Viscosity Grade
IRC:105-2019
1
SPECIFICATIONS FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM AND
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE FOR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
Aireld pavements are one of the most important assets of any Nation. Keeping these national
assets operational all the time has strategic importance. The IRC prepared IRC: 105 “Tentative
Specication for Bituminous Concrete (Asphaltic Concrete) for Aireld Pavements” in the year
1988. However, with the induction of New Large Aircrafts and heavy weight ghter aircrafts with
high tyre pressure and single wheel landing gear, a need has emerged to revise the technical
specications of different asphalt pavement layers in the aireld pavement. Besides reducing
fatigue cracking, these high-quality pavement layers would increase the service life of the
pavement. Sophisticated and high-speed weigh batch hot mix asphalt plants available in the
industry can ensure a high degree of quality output conforming to the mix design parameters.
This high-quality material can be rapidly paved with the new technology paving and compacting
equipment available. Hence need was felt to revise this document. According, the task of revision
of this document was entrusted to Flexible Pavement, Aireld & Runways Committee (H-2) of
IRC during tenure 2018-20. The initial draft was prepared by the subgroup comprising Col. R.S.
Bhanwala and Shri Manoj Kumar Shukla. Later H-2 Committee co-opted ofcers Col. Kulbir
Singh, MES and Shri Manoj Kumar Garg, AAI in the sub group. The draft was further deliberated
in various meetings of H-2 Committee. The H-2 Committee in its meeting held on 08.06.2019
approved the document subject to incorporation of comments of members for placing before
HSS Committee.
The composition of the H-2 Committee is given below:
Reddy, Prof. (Dr.) K. Sudhakar …….. Convenor
Nirmal, Sanjay Kumar …….. Co-Convenor
Shukla, Manoj Kumar …….. Member-Secretary
Members
Basu, S.B. Lal, Chaman
Bongirwar, P.L. Murthy, D.V. Sridhar
Bose, Dr. Sunil Panda, Prof. (Dr.) Mahabir
Director (Tech.), NRIDA (Pradhan, B.C.) Pandey, I.K.
Garg, Sanjay Pandey, R.K.
Ghai, Inderjit Rep. of DGBR (Das, Brig. A.K. VSM)
Jain, N.S. Sharma, S.C.
Jain, R.K. Singh, V.K.
IRC:105-2019
2
Jha, Bidur Kant Sinha, A.V.
Krishna, Prabhat Sitaramanjaneyulu, K.
Kumar, Prof. (Dr.) Praveen Tyagi, B.R.
Corresponding Members
Justo, Prof. (Dr.) C.E.G. (Expired in June, 2019)
Seehra, Dr. S.S.
Rao, Prof. (Dr.) S.K. Veeraragavan, Prof. (Dr.) A.
Ex-Ofcio Members
President,
Indian Roads Congress
(Basar, Toli), Chief Engineer,
PWD Arunachal Pradesh
Director General
(Road Development) & Special
Secretary to Govt. of India
(Pandey, I.K.), Ministry of Road
Transport & Highways
Secretary General,
Indian Roads Congress
Nirmal, Sanjay Kumar
The draft document was placed before the Highways Specications and Standards Committee
(HSS) in its meeting held on 20.07.2019. The HSS Committee decided that Co-Convenor, H-2
Committee will modify the document based on written comments and verbal comments offered
during the meeting and submit the nal document to IRC for placing before the IRC Mid-Term
Council meeting. The Mid-Term Council in its meeting held on 9
th
and 10
th
August, 2019 at Goa
approved the document for publishing.
The HSS Committee in its meeting held on 20.07.2019 authorized the Co-Convenor to nalize
the document based on comments offered during the meeting and submit nal document to IRC
for placing in the Mid-Term Council meeting. The Mid-Term Council in its meeting held on 9th
and 10th August, 2019 at Goa approved the document for publishing.
2. SCOPE
2.1 These Specications deal with the basic outline for the design, construction and
controls needed while laying dense graded bituminous mixes in base course, binder course and
wearing course for aireld pavements.
2.2 Dense graded bituminous mixes shall consist of mineral aggregate and appropriate
bituminous binder, mixed in a hot mix plant and laid with a mechanized paver. Dense graded
bituminous mixes such as binder and wearing courses are usually laid on a previously prepared
bituminous layer. Binder course is the intermediate layer between bituminous base course and
bituminous wearing course. Three different Specications for dense graded bituminous mixes
are available for use for aireld pavements. Purpose, layer thickness and number of layers
allowed for these Specications are given in Table 2.1.
IRC:105-2019
3
Table 2.1 Types of Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes, their uses,
Number of Layers and Layer Thickness
Specication Purpose
Number of
layers
Thickness of
each layer
Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM)
Grading 2 (NMAS 26.5 mm)
Base Course
Single or
multiple
50 mm - 100 mm
Bituminous Concrete (BC) Grading 1
(NMAS 19 mm) DAC-I
Binder Course Single 50 mm - 75 mm
Bituminous Concrete (BC) Grading 2
(NMAS 13.2 mm) DAC-II
Wearing Course Single 40 mm - 50 mm
3. DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM) AND DENSE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (DAC)
3.1 Material
3.1.1 Bitumen
The bitumen for dense graded bituminous mixes shall comply with Indian Standard Specication
for viscosity-graded paving bitumen, IS:73 or Polymer Modied Bitumen (PMB) complying with
the Bureau of Indian Standards Specication IS:15462. Only elastomeric Polymer Modied
Binder (PMB) with an elastic recovery value of at least 75% at 15ºC for the unaged binder shall
be used. All VG grades shall be produced at reneries only with conventional rening processes.
Guidelines for selection of grade of viscosity-graded paving bitumen and modied bitumen are
given in Tables 3.1 and 3.2.
As per given design Specication, the type and grade of modied bitumen to be used shall be
specied in the Contract.The use of Polymer Modied Bitumen is recommended for airelds
intended to be used by heavy aircrafts or aircrafts with high tyre pressures.
The Highest Daily Mean Air Temperatures and the Lowest Daily Mean Air Temperatures mentioned
in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 can be obtained from the weather station nearest to the project site from
the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). The IMD has data on daily mean high temperature
for all 365 days in a year for all weather stations based on historical records of the last 30-40 or
more years. This daily mean high temperature on a specic day is the same as daily “normal”
high temperature for that day as usually reported in some newspapers. The highest of the 365
daily mean high air temperatures (which usually occurs on some day in May or June) is used in
Tables 3.1 and 3.2. Likewise, the lowest daily mean air temperature (which usually occurs on
some day in January) can also be obtained from the IMD.
Table 3.1 Selection Criteria for Viscosity Graded (VG) Paving Bitumen Based on
Climatic Conditions for DBM and AC (DAC)
7-day Average Maximum Air
Temperature, ºC
Less than 30 30 to 38 38 to 45 More than 45
Grade of Bitumen VG-10 VG-20 VG-30 VG-40
IRC:105-2019
4
Table 3.2 Selection Criteria for Elastomeric Polymer Modied Bitumen (PMB) for DBM and BC
Highest Daily Mean Air Temperature, ºC
Lowest Daily Mean Air Temperature, ºC
Less than 20º C 20º to 30º C > 30º C
Grade of Modied Bitumen
More than -10º C PMB 120 PMB 70 PMB 40
-10º C or lower PMB 120 PMB 120 PMB 120
Bitumen shall be classied based on its absolute viscosity and suitability recommended
for maximum air temperature as given in Table 3.2. The paving bitumen binder shall be
homogenous and shall not foam when heated to 175
o
C. The selection of grade of bitumen
shall conform to the requirements prescribed in Table 3.3. The PMB, shall be prepared by
blending a suitable VG bitumen with additives at a renery with high shear mixing facility.
On site blending should not be permitted. The material shall be homogenous and shall not
foam, when heated at 170
o
C. No mineral matter other than naturally present, in the ingredient
materials, shall be used. Modier shall not de-mix of heating at 170
o
C or later during cooling.
Elastomeric thermoplastic polymer modied bitumen shall be used and it should conform to
the requirements given in Table 3.4.
Table 3.3 Requirements of Paving Bitumen
S.
No
Characteristic
Paving Grade
Test
Method
VG-10 VG-20 VG-30 VG-40
1
Penetration at 25
o
C, 100 g, 5 s,
0.1 mm, min
80 60 45 35 IS 1203
2
Absolute viscosity at 60
o
C,
Poise
800-
1200
1600-
2400
2400-
3600
3600-
4800
IS 1206
(Part 2)
3
Kinematic viscosity at 135
o
C,
cSt, min
250 300 350 400
IS 1206
(Part 3)
4
Flash Point (COC method),
o
C,
min
220 220 220 220
IS 1448
[P:69]
5
Solubility in trichloroethylene, %,
min
99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 IS 1216
6
Softening point (R&B)
temperature,
o
C, min
40 45 47 50 IS 1205
7
Tests on Residue from Rolling Thin Film Oven Test
(a) Viscosity ratio at 60
o
C, max 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
IS 1206
(Part 2)
(b) Ductility at 25
o
C, cm, min 75 50 40 25 IS 1208
IRC:105-2019
5
3.1.2 Coarse Aggregate
The coarse aggregate shall consist of crushed rock, crushed gravel or other hard material
retained on 2.36 mm sieve. It shall be clean, hard, and durable and shall have cubical shape, free
from dust and soft organic and other deleterious substances. The aggregate should preferably
be of low porosity. The coarse aggregate shall satisfy the physical requirements specied in
Table 3.5. Where crushed gravel is proposed for use as aggregate, not less than 90% by
weight of the crushed material retained on 4.75 mm sieve shall have at least two fractured
faces.
Table 3.4 Requirements of Elastomeric Thermoplastic Polymer Modied Bitumen (PMB)
S.
No
Characteristic
Grade and Requirements
Test Method
PMB-120 PMB-70 PMB-40
1
Penetration at 25
o
C, 100 g, 5 s,
0.1 mm, min
90-150 50-90 30-50 IS 1203
2
Softening point (R&B) temperature,
o
C, min
50 55 60 IS 1205
3 Fraass Breaking Point*,
o
C, max -20 -16 -12 IS 9381
4 Flash Point (COC method),
o
C, min 220 220 220 IS 1209
5
Elastic Recovery of Half Thread in
ductilometer at 15
o
C, percent, min
75 75 75
Annex 2 of
IRC:SP:53-2010
6
Separation, difference in softening
point (R&B) temperature,
o
C, max
3 3 3
Annex 3 of
IRC:SP:53-2010
7 Viscosity at 150
o
C, Poise 1-3 2-6 3-9 IS 1206 (part 2)
8
Tests on Residue from Rolling Thin Film Oven Test
(a) Loss in mass, percent, max 1.0 1.0 1.0 IS 9382
(b) Increase in Softening Point,
o
C,
max
7 6 5 IS 1205
(c) Reduction in Penetration, of
residue at 25
o
C, percent, max
35 35 35 IS 1203
(d) Elastic Recovery of Half Thread
in ductilometer at 25
o
C, percent, min
50 50 50
Annex 2 of
IRC:SP:53-2010
* Relevant to snow bound cold climate arears
IRC:105-2019
6
Table 3.5 Physical Properties of Coarse Aggregate
Property Test Requirement Test Method
Cleanliness Grain Size Analysis
Max.3% passing
0.075 mm sieve
IS 2386 Part 1
Particle shape
Flakiness and Elongation Index
(combined)
Max 30% IS 2386 Part 1
Strength
Los Angeles Abrasion Value Max 30% IS 2386 Part 4
Aggregate Impact Value Max 24% IS 2386 Part 4
Polishing * Polished Stone Value Min 55 IS 2386 Part 4
Durability
Soundness (Sodium or Magnesium Sulphate) – 5 cycles
Sodium Sulphate Max. 12% IS 2386 Part 5
Magnesium Sulphate Max. 18% IS 2386 Part 5
Water Absorption Water Absorption Max. 1% IS 2386 Part 3
Stripping **
Coating and Stripping of
Bitumen Aggregate Mixtures
Min. retained
coating 95%
IS 6241
Water sensitivity***
Retained Tensile Strength Ratio
(TSR)
Min. 80%
AASHTO T
283
* Only for wearing courses
** This test shall be conducted as a screening test for coarse aggregate only. It is mandatory to
conduct AASHTO T 283 for moisture susceptibility (Annexure I), which is conducted on the whole
designed bituminous mix as specied in Table 3.9
*** for TSR less than 80%, use of anti-stripping agents is recommended.
3.1.3 Fine Aggregate
Fine aggregate shall consist of crushed or naturally occurring mineral material, or a combination
of two, passing 2.36 mm sieve and retained on 0.075 mm sieve. No natural sand shall be
allowed in the binder and wearing courses and no more than 10 percent natural sand shall be
allowed in the base courses. The ne aggregate shall be clean, hard, durable, dry and free
from dust and soft organic and other deleterious substances. Fine aggregate shall have a sand
equivalent value not less than 50 when tested in accordance with the requirement of IS 2720 Part
37. The plasticity index of the fraction passing the 0.425 mm sieve shall not exceed 4% when
tested in accordance with IS 2720 Part 5. Aggregates for pavement mix shall be natural material
complying with IS:383 but with a Los Angeles Abrasion Test value not exceeding 30 percent. The
limits of deleterious materials shall not exceed the requirements set out in Table 3.6.
IRC:105-2019
7
Table 3.6 Permissible Limits of Deleterious Substances in Fine and
Coarse Aggregates (for All Layers)
S.
No
Deleterious Matter Test Method
For Fine Aggregates,
Percent by weight, max
For Coarse Aggregates,
Percent by weight, max
Uncrushed Crushed* Uncrushed Crushed*
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 Coal and lignite
IS:2386
(Part 2)-1963
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 Clay lumps
IS:2386
(Part 2)-1963
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
3
Material ner than 75
Micron IS sieve
IS:2386
(Part 1)-1963
3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0
4 Soft fragments
IS:2386
(Part 2)-1963
- - 3.0 -
5 Shale
IS:2386
(Part 2)-1963
1.0 - - -
6
Total of percentages of
all deleterious materials
(except mica) including
SNos. 1 to 5 for col 4,6
and 7 and SNos. 1 and 2
for Col 5 only
5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0
* Crushed aggregate with at least one fractured face
3.1.4 Filler
Filler shall consist of nely divided mineral matter such as rock dust, or hydrated lime or cement
as approved by the Engineer. The use of hydrated lime is encouraged because of its very good
anti-stripping and antioxidant properties. Rock dust or cement may be used if hydrated lime is
not available. The ller shall be graded within the limits indicated in Table 3.7.
Table 3.7 Grading Requirement of Mineral Filler
IS Sieve (mm) Cumulative % passing by Weight of total Aggregate
0.6 100
0.3 95 - 100
0.075 85 - 100
The ller shall be inert material free from organic impurities and shall have Plasticity Index
(PI) not greater than 4%. PI requirement will not apply if the ller is hydrated lime or cement.
Where the complete bituminous mixture fails to satisfy requirement of moisture susceptibility
test (AASHTO T 283 with freeze & thaw option) 2% (by total weight of aggregate) hydrated lime
shall be used and the percentage of ne aggregate reduced accordingly. See Annexure I for the
outline of modied AASHTO T 283.
IRC:105-2019
8
3.1.5 Aggregate Grading and Bitumen Content
The combined grading of the coarse aggregate, ne aggregate and ller, when tested in
accordance with IS 2386 Part 1, wet sieving method, shall conrm to limits given in Table 3.8.
The combined aggregate grading shall not vary from the lower limit on one sieve to the higher
limit on the adjacent sieve to avoid gap grading. The nes to bitumen (F/B) ratio by weight of total
mix shall range from 0.8 to 1.2 for all mixes mentioned in Table 3.1.
Table 3.8 Aggregate Gradation and Bitumen Content
Course Base Course Binder Course Wearing Course
Grading DBM Grading 2 BC Grading 1 BC Grading 2
Nominal Maximum
Aggregate Size (NMAS)*
26.5 mm 19 mm 13.2 mm
Layer Thickness 50-100 mm 50-75 mm 40-50 mm
IS Sieve Size (mm) Cumulative % by weight of total aggregate passing
37.5 100
26.5 90-100 100
19 71-95 90-100 100
13.2 56-80 59-79 90-100
9.5 - 52-72 70-88
4.75 38-54 35-55 53-71
2.36 28-42 28-44 42-58
1.18 - 20-34 34-48
0.6 - 15-27 26-38
0.3 7-21 10-20 18-28
0.15 - 5-13 12-20
0.075 2-8 2-8 4-10
Bitumen Content (Min)**
VG Grade Bitumen 4.5% 5.2% 5.4%
PMB - 5.4% 5.6%
* Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size is the largest specied sieve size upon which any of the
aggregate is retained.
** Bitumen content indicated in Table 3.8 is the minimum only. The exact bitumen content required
shall be determined following the Marshall Mix Design procedure contained in the Asphalt Institute
Manual MS-2 (Seventh Edition). The minimum bitumen contents given in the table correspond to
a bulk specic gravity of aggregates of 2.7. If the bulk specic gravity of aggregates is more than
2.7, the minimum bitumen content requirement can be reduced proportionately.
IRC:105-2019
9
3.2 Mix Requirements
3.2.1 Besides conforming to the requirements of grading and quality for individual
ingredients, the mix shall meet the requirement set out in Table 3.9.
Table 3.9 Requirements for DBM Grading 2, BC Grading 1 and BC Grading 2 Mixes
Parameter Requirement
Compaction Level (number of blows) 75 blows on each face of the specimen
Stability at 60
o
C (kN) AASHTO T 245, Min 9.0 for DBM-2
12.0 for BC-1
14.0 for BC-2
Flow (AASHTO T 245), mm 2.0 – 4.0
Air Voids (MS-2 and ASTM D 2041), Percent 3-5
Voids Filled with Bitumen (VFB) (Asphalt Institute,
MS-2), Percent
65-75
Marshall Quotient (stability/ow), kN/mm 2.5 to 5.0
Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR), (AASHTO T 283 with
freeze and thaw option) (see Annexure I for the
outline of this modied test method), Percent, Min.
80
Skid resistance (Airport Surface Friction Tester-
ASFT), ASTM E 1551, Min.
0.74 (ICAO 2002)
% Voids in Mineral aggregate VMA*
Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (mm)
Min VMA (%) related to design
air voids (%)
3.0 4.0 5.0
9.5 14 15 16
13.2 13 14 15
19.0 12 13 14
26.5 11 12 13
Coating and stripping of aggregates, Min 95% 95% 95%
Retained Stability (24 hours, 60
o
C, %, Min 90 90 95
* for intermediate air void contents, the min. VMA can be interpolated
3.2.2 Binder Content
The binder content shall be selected to obtain 3 - 5 percent air voids in the mix and to meet all
the requirements given in Table 3.9. The Marshall Method for designing the mix shall be adopted
as described in the Seventh Edition of the Asphalt Institute Manual MS-2. Binder content test to
be regularly conducted on plant mix.
IRC:105-2019
10
3.2.3 Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR)
TSR of the design mix shall be determined in accordance with AASHTO T 283 (Refer Annexure-I
for outline of this test). If the TSR of the mix conditioned with one Freeze and thaw cycle is less
than 80%, hydrated lime or liquid anti-stripping agent shall be used to satisfy this criterion.
3.2.4 Job Mix Formula
Prior to the start of work, the job mix formula shall be developed based on mix design conducted by
an approved laboratory. The laboratory mix design gives the proportion of the mineral aggregate
combination in terms of individual sieve sizes, for actual operational purpose in the eld, blending
of the two or more sizes of aggregates (each size having within its range of individual sieve size)
would be necessary. This blending ratio is obtained on a weight basis giving percent weight of the
coarse aggregate, ne aggregate and ller needed to give the ultimate gradation. This mineral
aggregate combination together with the corresponding optimum bitumen content as determined
in the laboratory, constitute the job mix formula for implementation during construction. The job
mix formula proposed for the use in the work shall give the following details:
i. Source and location of all materials
ii. Proportions of all materials
iii. Binder type and percentage by weight of total mixture
iv. Coarse aggregate/ne aggregates/mineral ller as percentage by weight of total
aggregate
v. A single denite percentage passing each sieve for the mix aggregate
vi. The individual grading of the individual aggregate fraction and the proportion of
each in the combined grading
vii. The test results of mix design such as theoretical maximum specic gravity of
loose mix (Gmm), compacted specimen densities, Marshall stability, ow, air
voids, VMA, VFB and related graphs, and test results of AASHTO T 283 Moisture
Susceptibility Test
viii. In case of batch mixer, the individual weight of each type of aggregate and
binder per batch
ix. Test results of aggregates and of all constituent materials.
Approval of the job mix formula shall be based on independent testing by the Engineer on
the samples furnished by the Contractor. It should be ensured that it is based on the truly
representative samples of the material that will be used for the work. New job mix formula shall
be approved whenever there is change in source of any constituent material used for the work.
3.2.5 Plant Trials
Plant trials shall be carried out to establish that the plant can produce uniform mix conforming to
the job mix formula. The permissible variation of the various ingredients in the actual mix from
the job mix formula shall be within the limits given in Table 3.10. These variations are intended
to apply to individual specimen taken for quality control test.
IRC:105-2019
11
Table 3.10 Permissible Variation from the Job Mix Formula
Description Permissible Variation
DBM BC
Aggregate cumulative % passing
19 mm or larger ± 8% ± 7%
13.2 mm/9.5 mm ± 7% ± 6%
4.75 mm ± 6% ± 5%
2.36 mm, 1.18 mm, 0.6 mm ± 5% ± 4%
0.3 mm, 0.15 mm ± 4% ± 3%
0.075 mm ± 2% ± 1.5%
Binder Content ± 0.3% ± 0.3%
Mixing Temperature ± 10
o
C ± 10
o
C
3.2.6 Laying Trials
Laying trials are carried out to establish that the proposed mix can be successfully laid and
compacted. The laying trial shall be carried out in an area, which does not form a part of the
work. A test track of 90 m long and 6-9 m wide is to be laid. This shall be similar to the project
area on which the bituminous layer is to be laid. Methodology, equipment and mix shall also be
similar to those proposed for the project.
The trials should establish that the proposed laying plan, compaction plan, and methodology are
capable of producing satisfactory results. The density of nished paving layer should not be less
than 93% of the average (Sample size N=3) theoretical maximum specic gravity of the loose
mix (Gmm) obtained on the day of trial following ASTM D 2041. See Annexure II for the outline
of ASTM D 2041.
3.3 Construction Operations
3.3.1 Preparation of Base
(a) Cleaning of the Surface: The surface shall be cleaned of all loose extraneous
matter by means of mechanical broom and high- pressure air jet from compressor
or any other approved equipment/method.
(b) Filling up of potholes and sealing of cracks: Any potholes and/or cracks shall
be repaired and sealed with the same material with which it is overlaid.
(c) Geosynthetics or Stress Absorbing Layers: Where specied layer of
geosynthetics/stress absorbing material is to be laid it should be as per
Specications conrming to MoRTH.
(d) Prole Correcting Course: Depending upon site requirement, prole correcting
course for correcting the existing pavement prole shall be laid either as a
IRC:105-2019
12
separate layer or as a composite layer with varying thickness as per layer charts.
DBM Grading 2 be used for this or as per given design.
3.3.2 Mixing
Dense graded bituminous mixes shall be prepared in a Hot Mix Plant (HMP) of adequate capacity
and capable of yielding a mix of proper and uniform quality with thoroughly coated aggregate.
The HMP employed at site shall be a weigh batch plant having a minimum capacity of 100 TPH.
The calibration certicate of the HMP used in the project shall be submitted to the Engineer
prior to the commencement of trial works. All plants used by the contractor for the preparation of
asphalt paving mixes shall be equipped with the following:
a) Facility for obtaining hot bin aggregate samples
b) Means for accurately weighing each batch of aggregate with separate load cells
in each bin before the combined aggregate mix is nally added to the pug mill
with heated bitumen
c) Bitumen tanks with arrangement of heating under effective and positive control
at all times. There should be satisfactory devices for weight, metering and
temperature monitoring of the bitumen
d) A mixer unit capable of producing a uniform mixture
e) If Polymer Modied Bitumen is used, Guidelines on use of Modied Bitumen as
stated in IRC:SP:53 should be followed for transportation, storage and heating.
Table 3.11 gives the mixing, laying, and rolling temperatures for dense graded mixtures with
reference to clause 501.3 MoRTH Specications. Exact mixing and compaction temperatures
for VG-30 and other viscosity grades will be determined based on paving bitumen viscosities at
60ºC and 135ºC following the procedure given in the Asphalt Institute Manual MS-2. In case of
modied bitumen, the temperature of mixing and compaction shall be higher than the mix with
conventional bitumen as binder. The exact temperature depends upon the type and amount of
modier used and shall be adopted as per the recommendations of the manufacturer. In order to
ensure uniform quality of mix, the plant shall be calibrated from time to time.
Table 3.11 Mixing, Laying and Rolling Temperatures for Dense
Bituminous Mixtures (Degree Celsius)
Bitumen
Viscosity
Grade
Bitumen
Temperature
(
o
C)
Aggregate
Temperature
(
o
C)
Mixed Material
Temperature
(
o
C)
Laying
Temperature
(
o
C)
*Rolling
Temperature
(
o
C)
VG-40 160-170 160-175 160-170 150 Min 100 Min
VG-30 150-165 150-170 150-165 140 Min 90 Min
VG-20 145-165 145-170 145-165 135 Min 85 Min
VG-10 140-160 140-165 140-160 130 Min 80 Min
PMB 165-185 165-185 150-170 140-160 110 Min
*All rolling must be completed before the mat cools to these minimum temperatures.
IRC:105-2019
13
3.3.3 Transportation
Bituminous material shall be transported in clean, insulated covered vehicles. Asphalt release
agent, which does not adversely affect the bituminous mix, may be applied to the interior of the
vehicle to prevent sticking and to facilitate discharge of the material. Use of diesel oil shall not
be allowed as asphalt release agent. The hot mix in the truck shall be covered adequately with
tarpaulin at all times to minimize loss of heat.
3.3.4 Laying
(a) Weather and Seasonal Limitations
Bituminous mixes shall not be laid:
(a) In presence of standing water on the surface
(b) When rain is imminent and during rains, fog, or dust storm
(c) When the base/binder course is damp
(d) When the air temperature on the surface on which it is to be laid is less than
10
o
C for mix with conventional bitumen as binder and is less than 15
o
C for mix
with modied bitumen as binder
(e) When the wind speed at any temperature exceeds 40 km/h at 2-meter height
(b) Preparation of the Base: Base shall be prepared by carrying out all or some of the
operations as per Clause 3.3.1, depending upon the site conditions.
(c) Spreading: Except in areas where paver cannot access, bituminous mix shall be
spread, levelled and tamped by self-propelled hydrostatic paver nisher with a sensor.
The paver shall be capable of laying asphalt mix to a minimum width of 7.5 m. As
soon as possible after arrival at site the material shall be supplied continuously to
the paver and laid without delay. The rate of delivery of material to the paver shall be
regulated to enable the paver to operate continuously to avoid minor undulations. The
travel rate of paver and the method of operation shall be adjusted to ensure even and
uniform ow of bituminous mix, free from dragging, tearing and segregation.
3.3.5 Compaction
Compaction shall commence as soon as possible after laying and shall be completed before
the temperature falls below the minimum rolling temperatures given in Table 3.11. Rolling of the
longitudinal joints shall be done immediately behind the paving operation. After this, the rolling
shall commence at the edge and progress towards the center longitudinally except at sections
with unidirectional camber, where it shall progress from lower edge to upper edge parallel to
center line of the pavement. Paving and Rolling operations should be planned such that the
pavers and rollers do not stop anywhere on the paving mat during the work (to avoid minor
undulations).
The initial or breakdown rolling shall be done with a vibratory steel wheel roller in vibratory mode.
However, the vibratory system shall be turned off during the rst pass if the mix is too tender
or plastic. The intermediate rolling shall be done with smooth wheel pneumatic tyred roller of
IRC:105-2019
14
15 to 30 tonnes, with a tyre pressure of at least 7 kg/sq cm. The nished rolling shall be done
with 8 to 10 tonnes smooth wheel roller. Rolling shall continue till all the roller marks are removed
from the surface and the minimum specied eld density is achieved. Rolling pattern shall be
nalized by engineer while laying the trial bay.
The dense graded bituminous mixes shall be rolled in the longitudinal direction, with the roller as
close as possible to the paver. The overlap on successive passes should be at least one-third of
the width of the rear roll or in the case of pneumatic wheeled rollers, at least the nominal width
of 300 mm. The roller should move at a speed of no more than 5 km/hour. The roller shall not be
permitted to stand on the pavement, which has not been fully compacted. All precautions shall
be taken to prevent dropping of oil, grease, petrol or other foreign material on the pavement. The
wheel of the rollers shall be kept moist with the water or spray system provided with the machine
to prevent the mixture from adhering to the wheels. Minimum moisture to prevent adhesion
between wheels and mixture shall be used and surplus water shall not be allowed to stand on
the partially completed pavement.
The nal compaction will be carried out with a pneumatic tyred roller of 15 to 30-ton capacity
having tyre pressure of 7 kg/sq cm after the of entire paving operations are completed. This
should be done on bright sunny days such that each area on the entire aireld is rolled minimum
ve times considering overlap of each pass of PTR.
The degree of compaction achieved by rolling shall be determined by cutting 150 mm diameter
cores from the nished surface. One eld density test shall be conducted for every 500 sq m.
If required cores can be cut as per site condition/nished surface to determine the eld density
and relative compaction in percentage. The eld density should be at least 93% of the maximum
theoretical specic gravity of the loose mix obtained on that day, that is, no more than 7% air
voids in the compacted mat. The maximum theoretical specic gravity shall be determined in
accordance with ASTM D 2041 (refer Annexure-II for outline of this test). The portion of the
work represented by the eld density of which is less than 93% of maximum theoretical specic
gravity shall be rejected.
Where this is not found possible, the work shall be removed and redone by the contractor at his
own risk and cost. Use of nuclear or non-nuclear portable density gauge to control mat density
during paving operations is recommended. However, only core density from 150 mm diameter
cores shall be used for acceptance. Therefore, contractor shall correlate his density gauge with
cores for that specic project during construction.
3.3.6 Joints
Echelon paving with two or more pavers should be used to minimize the number of longitudinal
joints on the aireld. Longitudinal joints in successive layers shall be offset by at least 300 mm
from parallel joints in the layer beneath.
All joints shall be cut vertical to an even line with a cutting wheel or other suitable device to
a width not less than the course thickness. All loosened material shall be discarded and the
vertical face be coated with tack coat of VG-30 or VG-10 viscosity grade bitumen or cold applied
emulsied bitumen prior to laying the adjacent lane. While spreading the material along the joint
the material spread shall overlap 25 mm to 40 mm on the previously laid mix beyond the vertical
IRC:105-2019
15
face of the joint. The thickness of the loose overlap material should be approximately a quarter
more than the nal compacted thickness. The overlapped mix should be bumped back with a lute
just across the joint so that the excess material on the hot side can be pressed to obtain a high
joint density. Rolling of longitudinal joints shall be done with roller on the hot side with 150 mm
overlap on the previously laid cold lane. The joint density when measured by taking 150 mm
diameter cores right on the joint shall be at least 90% of the theoretical maximum specic gravity
obtained on that day. In multi–layer construction, the joints in one layer shall offset the joints in
the underlying layer by 150 mm. However, the joint in the top layer shall be along the centre line
of the pavement and to be kept to the minimum.
3.3.7 Arrangement for Trafc
It shall be ensured that no trafc is allowed on the surface until the paved mat has cooled below
a temperature of 50
o
C, at its surface.
3.4 Controls
3.4.1 Thickness Control and Measurement
Thickness of various layers shall be accurately maintained during the construction as specied
in the design and shall be checked/monitored continuously by taking regular levels and
maintaining level sheets. Regular calibration of sensor paver to be ensured for thickness to be
spread and compacted thickness should be monitored. In case of dispute the following method
for determination of thickness be adopted:
Average Thickness Determination Using Cores: In areas where density testing using cores
has been undertaken in accordance with the clause on compaction the average thickness of
the course will be determined on the basis of thickness measurements of the cores obtained.
Measurement of individual cores will be made after cleaning of any adhering material from
the bottom of the core and shall be the average of four measurements of thickness made at
approximately 90° apart. Measurements shall be made to the nearest 1 mm and the average of
the four measurements expressed to the nearest 1 mm. The average thickness of a course in an
area will be the average thickness of a minimum of four cores expressed to the nearest 1 mm
and the area for each assessment shall be not less than 1,000 m² and not more than 1,500 m
2
.
3.4.2 Determination of Finished Surface Levels
All nished surface levels shall be surveyed by precise levelling instruments and the survey shall
be undertaken by Engineer-in-Charge. The nished surface level of the completed pavement
shall not vary by more than 7 mm below or 7 mm above the nished surface level as nalized.
Not withstanding, the interface of runway or taxiway and shoulders shall be ush.
3.4.3 Tolerance in Surface Levels of Different Layers
The levels of the subgrade and different pavement layers as constructed shall not vary from
those calculated with surface to the longitudinal and cross prole of pavement as per ICAO
standards/Relevant Specications beyond the tolerances as mentioned below :
IRC:105-2019
16
(a) Subgrade: +/- 15 mm
(b) Sub-base: +/- 10 mm (exible pavement)
(c) Base Course:
i. Bituminous: +/- 6 mm
ii. Granular: +/- 10 mm
(d) Wearing Course: +/- 3 mm
3.4.4 Surface Evenness
The measurement and checking of surface evenness shall be done by a 3 m straight edge in
accordance with the procedures in IRC:SP:16. The maximum permissible surface unevenness
using this longitudinal prole 3 m straight edge shall be 3 mm.
Where the surface unevenness falls outside the tolerance, in either case i.e. the surface is low or
high, the full depth of the layer shall be removed and replaced with fresh material and compacted
to the Specication.
3.4.5 Surface Finish
The nished surface of the asphalt wearing course shall present a tightly bonded surface of
uniform appearance, free of dragged areas, cracks, segregation and open textured patches. The
quality of surface nish shall be nalized during trial bay.
3.4.6 Quality Control during Construction
The material supplied and the work shall conform to the Specications prescribed in the preceding
Clauses. To ensure the quality of the material and the work, control tests shall be conducted
during the execution of the paving project. The tests and minimum frequency for each test are
indicated in Table 3.12.
Table 3.12 Control Tests for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes/BC
and their Minimum Frequency
S. No Test Frequency
1 Quality of binder* Number of samples per lot and tests as per
IS 73/IRC:SP:53/IS 15462
2 Aggregate impact value/Los Angeles
Abrasion value
One test per 50 m
3
of aggregate and
whenever there is change of source
3 Flakiness and Elongation Index (combined) One test per 50 m
3
of aggregate
4 Soundness test (Sodium or Magnesium
Sulphate test)
1 test for each method for each source and
whenever there is change in the quality of
aggregate
5 Water absorption of aggregate 1 test for each source and whenever there
is change in the source of aggregate
6 Sand equivalent test 1 test for each source
IRC:105-2019
17
S. No Test Frequency
7 Plasticity Index 1 test for each source
8 Polished stone value 2 test for each source and whenever there
is change in aggregate
9 Percent of fractured faces One test per 50 m
3
of aggregate when
crushed gravel is used.
10 Mix grading One set for individual constituent material
and mixed aggregate from dryer for each
400 tonnes of mix subject to minimum of
three tests per day per plant
11 Stability and voids analysis of mix including
theoretical maximum specic gravity of
loose mix
3 tests for stability, ow value, density and
void contents for each 400 tonnes of mix
subject to minimum of three tests per day
per plant
12 Moisture Susceptibility of mix
(AASHTO T 283)
1 test for each mix type whenever there is
change in the quality or source of coarse
or ne aggregate
13 Temperature of binder in boiler, aggregate
in dryer and mix at the time of laying and
compaction
At regular intervals during everyday’s work
14 Binder content (centrifuge or NCAT Ignition
Oven Method)**
One set for each 400 tonnes of mix subject
to minimum of three tests per day per plant
15 Density of compacted layer One test per 500 m
2
area.
* Each tanker of bitumen binder before being used shall be tested for all Specications as per IRC/
IS and manufacture test certicate.
** Bitumen content shall be determined using the centrifuge method (ASTM D 2172) or NCAT Ignition
Oven method (ASTM D 6307). If centrifuge method is used, the nes passing through the lter
and are in the extract solvent shall be accounted for by the ash method. If NCAT Ignition Oven is
used it shall be calibrated for the mix being tested.
IRC:105-2019
18
Annexure I
OUTLINE OF AASHTO T 283, “RESISTANCE OF COMPACTED ASPHALT MIXTURES TO
MOISTURE-INDUCED DAMAGE”
1. Scope and Summary of Test Method
This method covers preparation of compacted bituminous mixtures and the measurement of the
change of diametral tensile strength resulting from the effects of water saturation and laboratory
accelerated stripping phenomenon with a freeze-thaw cycle. The result may be used to predict
long-term stripping susceptibility of bituminous mixtures and evaluate liquid anti-stripping
additives that are added to bitumen or pulverized mineral materials such as hydrated lime, which
are added to the mineral aggregate.
Each set of 6 compacted specimens is divided into two equal subsets. One subset is tested in
dry condition for indirect tensile strength. The other subset is subjected to vacuum saturation
and a freeze-thaw cycle (thawing in a hot water bath) before testing for indirect tensile strength.
Numerical indices of retained indirect tensile strength properties are calculated from the test
data obtained by testing the two subsets: dry and conditioned.
2. Testing Equipment
(a) Vacuum container, vacuum pump, manometer, and other accessories as specied
in ASTM D 2041, “Theoretical Maximum Specic Gravity and Density of Bituminous
Paving Mixtures”.
(b) Balance or scale accurate to 0.1 percent of the test load
(c) Two water baths capable of maintaining temperatures of 60ºC +/- 1ºC and
25ºC +/- 0.5ºC
(d) Freezer maintained at –18ºC (+/- 3º C)
(e) 10 ml graduate cylinder
(f) Loading jack and ring dynamometer (Marshall stability testing machine can be used)
to provide a vertical rate of deformation of 50 mm (2 inches) per minute and capable
of reading the maximum failure load
(g) Steel loading strips with a concave surface having a radius equal to the normal
radius of the test specimen. The loading strips shall be 12.7 mm (0.5 inch) wide for
specimens 100 mm (4 inches) in diameter. The loading strips for 150 mm (6 inches)
diameter specimens shall be 19.05 mm (0.75 inch) wide. The length of the loading
strips shall exceed the thickness of the specimens. Steel strip are provided at the top
and bottom of specimens during indirect tensile testing.
3. Test Procedure
(a) Make at least 6 compacted specimens for each mixture, 3 to be tested dry and 3 to
be tested after partial saturation and moisture conditioning with a freeze-thaw cycle.
Some extra specimens will need to be made to establish compaction procedures in
order to obtain specied air void contents in the test specimens by trial and error.
IRC:105-2019
19
(b) Compact the 6 specimens with a Marshall Compactor so that the compacted specimens
have air voids of 7.0 +/- 0.5 percent. This level of high air voids can be obtained by
adjusting the number of Marshall blows applied on each side of the specimen by
trial and error (start at about 10 blows as a starting point). Air void content must be
calculated from the bulk specic gravity of the compacted specimen (determined by
saturated surface dry method as per procedure given in the Asphalt Institute MS-2)
and the maximum theoretical specic gravity of the loose bituminous mixture obtained
by ASTM D 2041.
(c) Separate the 6 specimens into 2 subsets so that the average air voids of the two
subsets are approximately equal.
(d) One set will be tested dry. Keep it at room temperature and then place in a 25ºC (+/-
0.5ºC) water bath for 2 hours prior to determining their indirect tensile strength.
(e) The other subset will be conditioned as follows:
(i) Place and submerge the 3 specimens in the vacuum container lled with water
at room temperature. Apply a vacuum of 13-67 kPa absolute pressure (10-26
inches Hg partial pressure) for 30 minutes. Remove the vacuum and leave the
specimens submerged in water for 5 to 10 minutes. (Note: The water saturation
procedure noted above deviates from AASHTO T 283, which obtains a specied
degree of saturation. The above procedure keeps the time of saturation constant).
(ii) Wrap a plastic lm around eachsaturated specimen and place the wrapped
specimen in a plastic bag containing 10 ml of water and seal the plastic bag.
Place the plastic bag in a freezer at temperature of –18ºC +/- 3ºC for a minimum
of 16 hours. Remove the specimens from the freezer.
(iii) Place the specimens in a waterbath maintained at 60ºC +/- 1ºC for 24 hours.
Remove the plastic bag and the plastic lm from each specimen after placing
the specimens under water.
(iv) Remove the specimens from hotwater bath and place in a water bath maintained
at 25ºC +/- 0.5ºC for 2 hours.
(v) Remove the conditioned specimens and test for indirect tensile strength.
(f) Determine the indirect tensile strength of the 3 dry and 3 conditioned specimens at
25º C +/- 0.5ºC after removing from water bath. First, measure their mean thicknesses
(t). Then place the two steel loading strips on the bottom and top of the specimens
across diameter and place in the Marshall testing machine or a compression-testing
machine. Apply load to the specimens diametrally at a vertical rate of 50 mm (2 inches)
per minute.
(g) Record the maximum compressive strength noted on the testing machine and continue
loading until a vertical crack appears in the specimen. Remove the cracked specimen
from the machine and visually estimate the approximate degree of moisture damage
(extent of stripped or bare aggregate) on the fractured faces of the specimen on a
scale of 0 to 5 (5 being the most stripping).
IRC:105-2019
20
(h) Calculate the tensile strength (S
t
) in SI units of each specimen as follows:
S
t
= 2000 P/π td
Where, S
t
= tensile strength, kPa
P = maximum loads, N
t = specimen thickness, mm
d = specimen diameter, mm
(i) Express the numerical index of resistance of bituminous mixture to the detrimental
effects of water as the ratio of the original strength that is retained after accelerated
moisture and freeze-thaw conditioning.
Calculate the tensile strength ratio (TSR) as follows:
Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) = 100*(S2 / S1)
Where,
S1 = average tensile strength of the dry subset, kPa
S2 = average tensile strength of the conditioned subset, kPa
IRC:105-2019
21
Annexure II
OUTLINE OF ASTM D 2041, “THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND
DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES”
1. Scope and Summary of the Test Method
This test method covers the determination of the theoretical maximum specic gravity and density
of uncompacted bituminous paving mixtures at 25ºC. The theoretical maximum specic gravity
(Gmm) is used: (a) to calculate air voids in compacted bituminous mixtures, (b) to calculate the
amount of bitumen absorbed by the aggregate, and (c) to provide target value for the compaction
of paving mixtures in the eld.
A sample of loose paving mixture is placed in a tarred vacuum vessel. Water at 25ºC is added
to completely submerge the sample. A specied amount of vacuum is gradually applied to
remove the air bubbles entrapped between asphalt mix particles. After the vacuum is released,
the volume of the sample of the void less paving mixture is obtained by either immersing the
vacuum container with the sample in a water bath and weighing or by lling the calibrated vacuum
container level full of water and weighing in air.
2. Testing Equipment
(a) Container (either i or ii detailed below)
i. Vacuum bowls – Either a metal or plastic bowl with a diameter arranging from
180 to 260 mm and a bowl height of at least 160 mm. The bowl shall be equipped
with a stiff, transparent cover tted with a rubber gasket and a connection for the
vacuum line. The hose connection shall be covered with a small piece of ne
wire mesh to minimize loss of any ne material from the mix.
ii. Vacuum ask for weighing in air only A thick-walled volumetric glass ask with
a capacity of approx. 4000 ml, tted with a rubber stopper with a connection for
the vacuum line. The hose connection shall be covered with a small piece of ne
wire mesh to minimize loss of any ne material from the mix.
(b) Balance capable of being read to the nearest 0.1 gram. If weighing is to be done
under water, a suitable suspension arrangement shall be provided for weighing the
sample while suspended from the center of the balance.
(c) Vacuum pump, capable of evacuating air from the vacuum container to a residual
pressure of 4.0 kPa (30 mm of Hg) or less. Provide a suitable trap between the pump
and container to minimize water vapour entering the vacuum pump.
(d) Residual pressure manometer or calibrated absolute pressure gauge with a bleed
valve to adjust the vacuum level.
(e) Water bath capable of maintaining a constant temperature of 25ºC +/-1ºC and suitable
for immersion of the suspended container.
IRC:105-2019
22
3. Calibration of Containers
(a) Bowls – Determine the mass (B) of the container immersed in water at 25ºC +/- 1ºC.
If the bowl is used for weighing in air, place the volumetric lid on the bowl while under
water. Remove the water-lled bowl with the lid in place and dry prior to determining
the combined mass of the bowl, lid and water. Repeat 3 times and average the
3 masses. Designate the average mass as D.
(b) Flasks Calibrate the volumetric ask by accurately determining the mass of the
ask lled with water at 25ºC +/- 1ºC. Use a glass cover plate to ensure the ask is
completely full.
4. Test Procedure
(a) Separate the particles of the loose paving mixture (while it is warm) by hand so that
the particles are not larger than about 6 mm. Do not fracture the aggregate. Place the
mix sample directly into the tared bowl or ask. Weigh the container with the sample
and designate the net mass of the sample only as A. (Note: The minimum sample
size shall be 1500 g for mixes with nominal maximum aggregate sizes of 12.5 mm or
smaller; and shall be 2500 g for mixes with nominal maximum aggregate sizes from
19 to 25 mm.)
(b) Add sufcient water at 25ºC to cover the sample completely. Place the cover (bowels)
or stopper (asks) on the containers.
(c) Place the container with the sample and water on a mechanical agitation device or
agitate manually at frequent intervals (2 to 3 minutes). Begin removing entrapped air
by gradually applying vacuum and increasing the vacuum pressure until the residual
manometer reads 3.7 +/- 0.3 kPa (27.5 +/- 2.5 mm of Hg). After achieving this level
within 2 minutes, continue the vacuum and agitation for 15 +/- 2 minutes. Gradually
release the vacuum with the bleed valve.
(d) Weighing in water: Suspend the bowl (without lid) and contents in water for 10 +/- 1
minutes and then determine mass. Designate the mass under water of the bowl and
sample as C.
(e) Weighing in air:
i. Bowl – Submerge the bowl and sample slowly in the 25ºC +/- water bath. Keep
it there for 10 +/- 1 minutes. Immerse the lid in water and slide it onto the bowl
without removing water from the bowl so that no air is trapped inside the bowl.
Remove the bowl with the lid in place from the water bath. Dry the bowl and lid
with a dry cloth. Determine the mass of the bowl, sample, and lid and designate
it as E.
ii. Flask Fill the ask slowly with water ensuring not to introduce any air into
the sample. Place the ask in water bath for 10 +/- 1 minutes to stabilize the
temperature at 25ºC without submerging the top of the ask. Completely ll the
ask with water using a cover plate without entrapping air beneath the cover
plate. Wipe the exterior of the ask and cover plate. Determine the mass of the
ask, plate and its contents completely lled with water. Designate this mass as
E.
IRC:105-2019
23
(f) Calculations – Calculate the maximum specic gravity of the sample of loose paving
mixture as follows:
Bowls Used Under Water
Determination: Gmm = A / [A-(C-B)]
Where,
Gmm = maximum specic gravity of the mixture
A = mass of the dry sample in air, g
B = mass of bowl under water, g
C = mass of bowl and sample under water, g
Bowls in Air Determination
Gmm = A / (A+D-E)
Where,
Gmm = maximum specic gravity of the mixture
A = mass of dry sample in air, g
D = mass of lid and bowl with water at 25ºC, g
E = mass of lid, bowl, sample and water at 25ºC, g
Flask
Gmm = A/(A+D-E)
Gmm = maximum specic gravity of the mixture
A = mass of dry sample in air, g
D = mass of cover plate and ask lled with water at 25ºC, g
E = mass of ask, cover plate, sample, and water at 25ºC, g
INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
2019
IRC:105-2019
(The Official amendments to this document would be published by
the IRC in its periodical, ‘Indian Highways’ which shall be
considered as effective and as part of the Code/Guidelines/Manual,
etc. from the date specified therein)
SPECIFICATIONS FOR DENSE BITUMINOUS
MACADAM AND BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
FOR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
(First Revision)