Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOI: 10.5364/ipiv.7.2.46
Moving Past Victimization and Trauma Toward
Restoration: Mother Survivors of Sex Trafficking Share
Their Inspiration
Monica Faulkner
1*
,
Neely Mahapatra
2
, Laurie Cook Heffron
1
, Maura Busch Nsonwu
3
, Noël Busch-Armendariz
1
Little research examines the experiences of victims of sex trafficking after they have been rescued and only a handful of studies collected
primary data from these victims. This qualitative study involved in-person interviews with immigrant sex trafficking victims. Findings
reveal that female victims face challenges similar to transnational mothers; they experience separation and their role as mothers is
largely focused on self-sacrifice. Findings also suggest that it is important for practitioners to understand that female immigrant sex
trafficking victims who are mothers may have a strong commitment to their children that may assist them toward restoration and
looking toward the future.
uman trafficking victims are forced into slavery
for domestic servitude, labor industries, street
peddling, agricultural work, restaurant services,
factory work, and/or for sexual exploitation
(prostitution, strip clubs, peep shows, etc.) (Bales &
Lize, 2005; Busch-Armendariz, Nsonwu, Cook
Heffron, & Mahapatra, 2013). In the United States
and internationally, sex trafficking is the fastest
growing form of human trafficking (Hodge, 2008;
Macy & Johns, 2011; United Nations, 2002)
primarily because of the demand for paid sexual
services. While the United States is a destination
country for sex trafficking victims, exact numbers of
individuals trafficked for the purpose of sexual
exploitation are unknown (Macy & Johns, 2011).
However, the U.S. Department of Justice estimates
that 82% of suspected trafficking cases are classified
as sex trafficking (Banks & Kyckelhahn, 2011).
The impact of sex trafficking as a human rights,
criminal justice, and public health issue is garnering
increased attention by advocates and scholars
because of its impact on victims and communities
(Raymond & Hughes, 2001; World Health
Organization, 2000). Sex trafficking victims
experience physical violence, long-term emotional
distress, and health problems (Busch-Armendariz, et
al., 2013; Decker, Silverman, & Raj, 2007; Hodge,
2008; Macy & Johns, 2011; Raymond & Hughes,
2001). As sex trafficking victims are more likely to
be women (Macy & Johns, 2011), sex trafficking is
recognized by the World Health Organization as a
form of violence against women (WHO, 2000). The
WHO has noted that trafficking for the purposes of
sexual exploitation has likely increased the global
spread of HIV/AIDS.
Despite the impact of sex trafficking there is little
empirical information about victims of sex
trafficking. Indeed much of the literature focuses on
debates on how best to estimate the number of
trafficking victims rather than how to serve victims.
Different agencies, governments, and advocates use
estimates to account for the lack of systemic data
collection (Feingold, 2010). Much of the information
on trafficking, and sex trafficking, in particular,
involves moral debates about definitions and
differences between prostitution and sex trafficking
(Laczko, 2005; Zhang, 2009). Rather than engage in
an ongoing debate about human trafficking estimates
and definitions, this research contributes to existing
literature by listening to the needs of trafficking
victims as they report. There is also limited
information regarding victims of sex trafficking to
inform service delivery models (Macy & Johns,
2011). Additionally, there is still little information
about the wellbeing and needs of victims once they
are identified and rescued (Busch-Armendariz et al.,
2013; Logan, Walker, & Hunt, 2009; Macy & Johns,
2011). In particular, information about the long-term
experiences of trafficking victims is nearly absent
from the literature. In a comprehensive literature
review of services for sex trafficking victims, Macy
and Johns (2011) note the absence of literature on the
unique needs of sex trafficking victims who are
mothers.
H
1
School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, D3500, Austin, TX 78712,
2
University of Wyoming, 1000 E
University Ave, Laramie, WY 82071,
3
A & T State University, 1601 East Market Street, Greensboro, NC. *e-mail: mfaul[email protected]texas.edu
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
47
The Press
This study contributes to the existing literature by
presenting information from in-depth interviews with
victims of international sex trafficking who are
mothers. Few studies have interviewed victims of
trafficking living in the United States after their
rescue (Aron, Zweig, & Newmark, 2006; Busch,
Fong, Heffron, Faulkner, & Mahapatra 2007;
Busch-Armendariz et al., 2008; Busch-Armendariz,
Nsonwu, Cook Heffron, Hernandez, & Garza, 2009;
The Florida State University Center for the
Advancement of Human Rights, 2003). More often
literature regarding trafficking involves interviews
with service providers about the services victims
need. Thus, the voice of victims is not readily
represented in the literature on trafficking,
specifically sex trafficking.
The current study involves a secondary analysis
of 13 interviews conducted by Monica Faulkner and
colleagues as part of an evaluation of a local human
trafficking coalition in Austin, Texas, United States
of America. Anti-trafficking coalitions have formed
across the United States as service providers
collaborate to advocate and coordinate services for
victims of trafficking identified in their geographic
area. The purpose of the larger program evaluation
was to explore the effectiveness of the local
collaboration in serving the needs of trafficking
victims. Using the data from that larger program
evaluation, the current study explores the experiences
of immigrant sex trafficking victims who were also
mothers.
Overview of Human Trafficking
The U.S. Department of State publishes an annual
report providing updated estimates on the number of
individuals suspected of being trafficked
internationally. A recent report estimates that there
are approximately 27 million trafficking victims
worldwide (US State Department, 2011). However,
there are no national or internationally representative
statistics that document the exact number of victims
trafficked to the United States every year because
trafficking victims are difficult to identify (Brennan,
2005; Tyldum & Brunovskis, 2005). The United
States Department of Justice has created a Human
Trafficking Reporting System (HTRS) that is the
only system currently used to collect information on
trafficking investigations in the United States (Banks
& Kyckelhahn, 2011). The HTRS is limited because
it only captures data on trafficking victims whose
cases were investigated by a federally funded law
enforcement task force and currently contains
information from only 527 victims. However, given
the lack of information otherwise available, HTRS
provides exploratory information about sex
trafficking victims.
Based on HTRS data, 48.4% of sex trafficking
cases involved adults and 40.4% of sex trafficking
cases involved sexual exploitation of a child. Of these
cases, 94% of the victims were female and only 13%
were over the age of 25. More than half were Black
and the majority were U.S. citizens. Only 17% of sex
trafficking cases involved international victims
(Banks & Kyckelhahn, 2011).
International data on trafficking suggest similar
patterns to the United States data80% of all
trafficking victims are women and 50% children.
That is, the majority of sex trafficking victims are
women and many female victims are under the age of
18 years. While the United States government has
called for more awareness of the possibility that male
children are being trafficked into the sex industry
(U.S. Department of State, 2008a), research suggests
that girls and young women in impoverished
countries are most likely to be victims of sex
trafficking (Macy & Johns, 2011).
Trafficking Victims Protection Act
The United States has addressed human trafficking
by enacting major legislation intended to prevent
trafficking, prosecute perpetrators and assist victims
of trafficking. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act
(TVPA) was enacted in 2000 and has been
reauthorized several times. Among other policy
statements, the TVPA recognizes survivors of
trafficking as victims of a crime rather than
individuals who are in the United States without legal
permission. TVPA defines trafficking as the
“recruitment, harboring, transporting, provision, or
obtaining of a person for labor or services, through
the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of
subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt
bondage, slavery or forced commercial sex acts”
(TVPA Section 103[8]).
Whether or not a victim is entitled to services
authorized under the TVPA depends on
that person being “certified as a victim of human
trafficking by a recognized official. A victim who is
willing to cooperate with law enforcement and whose
presence in the United States is necessary for her
safety and/or prosecution of traffickers can be
“certified” as a victim of trafficking (Bishop, 2003).
Certification entitles the victim to certain federal and
state programs such as Medicaid and food stamps.
However, advocates working with victims of
trafficking report the certification process to be slow
and difficult for victims due to bureaucratic hurdles
related to coordination among multiple agencies such
as law enforcement and immigration (Busch, Fong,
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
48
Heffron, Faulkner, & Mahapatra, 2007).
Once a victim has been certified, he or she may
apply for a T-Visa that allows permanent residency in
the United States. Not only does the T-Visa allow
victims to remain in the U.S. legally, it also provides
a path for future citizenship and promotes family
reunificationit permits victims to apply for a
T-Visa for their children, spouse, parents, and
unmarried siblings under the age of 18
(Busch-Armendariz, 2012). In the HRTS data
presented above, only 90 of the 527 identified victims
were in the United States without immigration
documentation and of that number, 21 received
T-Visas and more than half had paperwork that was
still pending (Banks & Kyckelhahn, 2011).
Sex Trafficking in the United States
The U.S. State Department (2008a) identifies the
United States as a destination country for
international sex trafficking victims because of the
demand for paid sexual services. Indeed, the United
States is thought to be the second largest destination
country behind Germany (Mizus, Moody, Privado, &
Douglas, 2003). In general, international trafficking
victims come to the United States from “source”
countries in Central America, East Asia, Africa,
Eastern Europe, and various other parts of Asia.
Many victims are trafficked through Mexico that is
considered a “transit” country. However, recent
research has suggested that sex trafficking victims
may be more likely to be trafficked from specific
North and Central American countries, primarily
Mexico and El Salvador (Clawson, Dutch, Salomon,
& Grace, 2009; U.S. Department of Justice, 2008b).
Sex trafficking has become a large and profitable
industry. Trafficking generates an estimated US $32
billion according to the International Labour
organisation (ILO, 2005), but the exact amount is
unknown. Although the extent of trafficking is
largely unsubstantiated, the primary reason
trafficking exists is demand (Feingold, 2005; U.S.
State Department, 2011). In particular, the demand
for paid sex, primarily driven by male consumers,
encourages sex trafficking in the United States
(Barry, 1984; Bishop & Robinson, 1998). Victims of
trafficking are often coerced or forced into a
trafficking situation based on poverty and gender
discrimination in developing countries and the
prospect of a better life in more industrialized
countries (Everts, 2003). Globalization and the
demand for paid sex have created a profitable
industry that has become a large source of revenue
for organized crime (U.S. Department of State,
2006).
Victims trafficked for the purposes of sexual
exploitation may be forced to work in brothels,
massage parlors, pornography sites, or other venues.
In some cases, women may be coerced into the sex
industry in order to remain in the country or “to buy
their freedom” (McDonald, 1998). While in many
cases, victims are moved between locations, cities,
and states to avoid detection from law enforcement
(Raymond, Hughes, & Gomez, 2001), trafficking
does not have to include moving victims from one
locality to another.
Impact of Sex Trafficking
Sex trafficking victims may suffer long-term physical
and psychological impacts from their experiences.
Victims are often confined and have little to no
freedom because of constant monitoring by their
traffickers (U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 2009). Typically, traffickers provide little
nutritious food, expose victims to dangerous working
conditions, and provide no means to prevent the
spread of infectious disease (Spear, 2004). As a
result, victims experience health problems such as
sexually transmitted infections and urinary tract
infections. As they are frequently exposed to physical
violence, they are also likely to suffer physical
injuries (Raymond & Hughes, 2001). In addition to
health problems, victims of sex trafficking experience
depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), and panic attacks (Flowers, 2001; Raymond
& Hughes, 2001). Even years after their rescue,
victims report high rates of depression (Raymond &
Hughes, 2001).
Victim Assistance
Trafficking has received increased attention in recent
years due to several high profile cases and media
exposure in the United States, and the passage of the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) in 2000.
Despite this, there are few agencies that exclusively
serve victims of trafficking although organizations
for assisting trafficking victims continue to emerge
(Shigekane, 2007). After the passage of the TVPA,
the federal government also began to fund victim
assistance programs to meet the needs of victims of
human trafficking; many of the direct services staff in
these programs were social workers or other human
service professionals (Busch-Armendariz et al.,
2008). In areas where these specialized services
existed, once a victim had been rescued and/or
identified, he or she worked with a single-point-of
contact case manager to have his/her needs met
through a variety of other specialized agencies such
as NPOs, law enforcement, medical providers, and
legal agencies (Clawson, Small, Go, & Myles, 2003;
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
49
Busch-Armendariz et al., 2008). At first, victims need
the basic necessities of housing, food, medical care,
and safety (Aron, Zweig, & Newmark, 2006;
Clawson, Small, Go, & Myles, 2003; Busch et al.,
2007; Busch-Armendariz et al., 2008). After basic
needs have been met, victims face a long journey to
rebuild their lives and heal from their victimization.
For example, victims of sex trafficking may need
assistance to process the trauma of sexual abuse
(Human Rights Watch, 1995). Immigrant victims of
sex trafficking also need long-term support that may
include learning English, finding permanent housing
and employment, and eventually reuniting with their
children and other family members (Aron et al.,
2006). Immigrant sex trafficking victims may be able
to legally remain in the United States, but generally
need legal assistance to navigate the immigration
process (Macy & Johns, 2011).
Previous Studies
The majority of literature on human trafficking
focuses on defining the problem, presenting
estimates, and/or calls for increased attention to
trafficking. As previously stated, there have been
very few empirical studies on trafficking (Gozdziak
& Colette, 2005) and even fewer specifically on sex
trafficking (Schauer & Wheaton, 2006). Researchers
face methodological challenges locating victims due
to the hidden nature of the population (Brennan,
2005; Tyldum & Brunovskis, 2005), and thus, few
studies have collected data from victims. However,
recent studies have emerged in which victims of
trafficking have been directly studied (Aron, Zweig,
& Newmark, 2006; Busch et al., 2007;
Busch-Armendariz, et al., 2009; Raymond, Hughes,
& Gomez, 2001).
Raymond, Hughes, and Gomez (2001) conducted
the first interviews with victims of trafficking in the
United States. They interviewed 40 women in the sex
industry and found that 15 women had been
trafficked internationally and 11 women had been
trafficked domestically. The women interviewed had
multiple physical injuries, lacked access to
healthcare, had sexually transmitted infections, and
reported drug use as a means of coping with their
abuse. Furthermore, many of them had also fallen
pregnant as a result of sexual assault. Other studies
have focused on service delivery and the needs of
victims of trafficking (e.g., Aron, Zweig, &
Newmark, 2006). Finally, this current project has
also explored the needs of victims of sex trafficking
through in-depth interviews.
Overall, little research has addressed the long-
term experiences of victims of sex trafficking
(Busch-Armendariz et al., 2013; Busch et al., 2007;
Macy & Johns, 2011; Raymond & Hughes, 2001). To
date, research has not captured the experiences of sex
trafficking victims who are mothers as they re-create
their lives in the United States (Macy & Johns, 2011).
The current study explores the experiences of sex
trafficking victims as both mothers and survivors of
trafficking who are on a path toward restoration.
Method
Interview data from 13 immigrant sex trafficking
victims who are mothers were used to analyze their
experiences, future plans, hopes, and desires as they
attempt to re-build their lives in the United States.
The purpose of this present study is to examine the
experiences of immigrant sex trafficking victim
experiences’ following their rescue. Specific research
questions addressed are (a) what are the experiences
of international sex trafficking victims who are
mothers as they attempt to rebuild their lives in the
United States, and (b) what are the goals and plans of
mothers who are victims of international sex
trafficking?
Data Collection
Data were collected through in-depth face-to-face
interviews with victims. While a case manager or
social worker at an agency that serves human
trafficking victims identified and recruited the
participants, owing to the vulnerability of this group,
special precautions were taken to protect the
anonymity and confidentiality of participants. The
agency case manager ensured that all participants
were 18 and older, had been trafficked into the
United States for the purposes of working in the sex
industry and were able to participate in the interview
without creating psychological distress or
re-victimization. No other demographic or
identifying information was gathered. As many
victims were engaged in legal proceedings and some
may have been involved in cases in the media
spotlight, we did not collect any information that
could be used to identify victims. However, all the
women volunteered the information that they were
mothers in the interview even though they were not
specifically asked a question about motherhood or
had been screened into the sample based on their
status as mothers. We obtained only verbal informed
consent from the victims before participation in the
interview. The study was reviewed and approved by
the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at The
University of Texas at Austin. Interviews consisted
of 10 open-ended questions (see below) that asked
victims about the services they received after rescue.
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
50
Interview Protocol for Victims and Survivors
of Human Trafficking
1. What services did you need initially?
Were these services available? Were
they helpful?
2. Were there services that were not
helpful or not needed? Were there
services or actions that were actually
harmful to you or your situation?
3. What services do you currently need?
Are these services available to you?
4. What makes it difficult for you to
access the services you need?
5. What would make it easier for you to
access needed services?
6. What helped you most during this
process?
7. Would you change anything about the
way services are provided to other
victims of trafficking?
8. What was most challenging for you
about this experience?
9. In your current situation, do you feel
safe?
10. What are your hopes and plans for the
future?
Rescue is a term often used by law enforcement
following a raid or undercover investigation. In this
study, we did not ask specific questions in English or
using a certified translator, about the victims’
victimization or rescue or how they were trafficked
or how they were able to leave; however, the
interview included questions about their future plans.
Victims were interviewed at the offices of an NPO
that offers legal assistance or in the victims’ homes.
Most of the interviews were audiotaped, however,
when a victim did not consent to the interview being
audio-taped or when there were technological
difficulties, interviewers took detailed notes. We
transcribed all audio taped interviews and destroyed
tapes after transcription. Victims were provided with
US$50 as compensation for their time.
Data Analysis
After transcribing the interviews, conventional
content analysis as described by Hsieh and Shannon
(2005) was employed. Due to the lack of existing
theory and literature on sex trafficking, conventional
content analysis is an appropriate analytic design
because it allows themes to flow from the data
(Kondrack & Wellman, 2002; Hsieh & Shannon,
2005). This type of analysis has also been described
as inductive category development (Mayring, 2000)
because researchers analyze the data by labeling
thoughts and statements in the data and then grouping
the data into broader categories.
An iterative process of coding interviews was
employed. In the first step, research team members
read transcripts to allow them to get a sense of the
larger picture of the interviews (Tesch, 1990). After
this initial reading, interviews were open-coded by
research team members meaning that researchers
noted their initial thoughts and impressions (Hsieh &
Shannon, 2005). Research team members then met to
discuss their initial coding and to compare results.
The transcripts were then revisited and codes were
grouped into themes before research team members
met again to compare results. The themes identified
were specific to the victims’ current experiences and
future goals and these themes were selected for
inclusion in this paper.
Limitations of the Study
The study utilized a non-probability convenience
sample and, therefore, the findings are not
generalizable to all trafficking victims. In addition,
our participants are limited to women (who are also
mothers) from other countries and who were
trafficked for sexual exploitation into the United
States. Nonetheless, the findings from this study are
significant, and break ground with regard to our
understanding of the needs of human trafficking
victims and how they think about their futures. The
results have both practice and policy implications for
practitioners, leaders, and anti-trafficking advocates.
Results
Although the questionnaire focused on services the
victims had received, we also asked victims about
their future plans. Through that question, participants
spoke openly and extemporaneously about their lives
in America, their children and families, and their
faith. Three main themes emerged from the
interviews regarding the victims’ identities as they
moved from victimization to restoration: their
families’ future, hope for reunification with their
children and commitment to extended family and
their faith. Each gives vigor, strength, and ability to
endure past abuse and trauma and keep an eye toward
what hope and promise lies ahead.
Theme 1: Focus on the Future of their Families
Each victim commented on her hope for the future
and her plans for the future. Although they had
experienced severe sexual violence and trauma, the
victims were focused on rebuilding their lives. In
many cases, their goals were centered on their
children and this focus helped them to move from
victimization to restoration. The 13 victims expressed
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
51
their desire to stay in the United States so that their
children would have more opportunities than they
would have had in their home countries. One victim
said “I want to make my life here and give my son a
future here, for him to study here.” When speaking
about her son, another victim expressed her desire “to
see him graduate and become a doctor or something
big.” In another case, a victim explained that she felt
her future was really focused on her son and his
goals. She stated “Maybe I am wrong, but I just think
I am too old to reach my goals and I am just focusing
on (my son).”
Although their hopes for the future were
grounded in their children, the women were also
eager to obtain stable employment and learn English.
One victim stated[my] goal right now is to work; to
work and to learn English because it is very
necessary.” Various victims also expressed a desire
to buy a house, to get a GED, to assist family
members to come to the United States, and to earn
enough money to visit their family in their home
country. There was a general sentiment among the
victims that hard work was necessary to survive in
the United States. One victim stated “I think that here
in this country one of the things you need to survive
is to have bravery, to be brave in order to do what
you have to do.”
Theme 2: Hope for Reunification and Continued
Commitment to Family
Thinking about a future for their young children
contributed to their decision to originally re-locate to
the United States although, at the time, none of the
participants anticipated that they would be victimized
and trafficked. After their rescue, motherhood seems
to have driven them forward as they attempted to
rebuild lives in the United States. In general, four
victims reported a painful separation from their
children during their victimization and a
responsibility as a mother to focus on building a new
life in the United States despite their pain and
victimization.
In terms of reunifying with their children, five
victims expressed their desire and determination to
bring their children to the United States, as well as
their determination to achieve this goal helped them
to survive. At the time of this study, most of the
participants’ children remained in their home
countries despite their eligibility to reunite with their
mothers in the U.S. One participant talked about her
survival: “I think that during that time, the only thing
I needed was to bring my son home [to the US].”
Another stated that “All I have to do now is wait for
my daughter.”
For those victims who did not yet have their
children with them, supporting their families in their
countries of origin was both a concern and a source
of their motivation. Two participants talked about
their worry about not having enough money to send
for continued support of their family members.
Because many of the victims were motivated to leave
their home countries to support their families, there
was a feeling of continued responsibility to be the
main supporter. One victim said:
One of the things that frustrated me in the
beginning was that I didn’t have anything to send
my son. I have a six-year old son in (home
country) with my mother. So that frustrated me a
lotto have food, a place to sleep and a good roof
and not be able to send money home. Because that
is the reason I came here. Right? But now that I
have my money and I organize my monthly
spending, I decide what I am going to buy, what I
pay and how much I send home. I feel better. I feel
like I am advancing more.
Theme 3: Strength from Faith
Most participants had experienced several forms of
abuse ranging from physical abuse and rape to
emotional abuse. Despite experiencing high levels of
trauma, these victims exhibited an extraordinary level
of resiliency, especially in their confidence in
personal strength and functioning. Faith played an
important role in providing inner strength and the
ability to survive and succeed for some of the
women. Besides being a source of comfort in times
of crises for some victims, religious faith is critical in
promoting tenacity and helping victims of trauma to
conquer adversities (West, 2006; Weaver, Flannelly,
Garbarino, Figley, & Flannelly, 2003). Church and
other religious places helped them connect with
others in the community and expand their social
circle. Women found these contacts to be
instrumental in providing them with various kinds of
material, emotional, and moral support. Their
narratives communicated the strong influence
religion, faith and belief systems had on
strengthening motivation to cope and recover. In one
victim’s case, a priest was responsible for rescuing
the woman from her trafficker. The victim explained
how her belief in God and prayer helped her forgive
her subjugator and, thus, move on with her life. She
explained “Now I cover everything with prayer. I
cover everything. I carry it to God. I pray about the
children [of the trafficker] because the children loved
me so much. I pray even for the man. I forgive him.
In addition to the strength they derived from their
faith, services from faith-based organizations assisted
the women in establishing their lives in the United
States. Some victims received assistance in the form
of food, clothing, and other household items from
churches to settle comfortably into their new homes.
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
52
One victim shared how a church member gave her
essential items for her apartment. She said she was
from a church that I was attending, she gave me some
things that other people had given her. So she gave
them to me, and among those things was a bed.”
Two victims expressed some doubt about their
ability to survive in the United States. They found
comfort in knowing that advocates with their local
trafficking coalition would be available to help them.
The victims were generally very grateful for the help
that advocates gave them, especially as they set out
on their own. One victim stated “I feel like I always
had the intention of being independent to move on
my own, but I always knew that if I got a little stuck,
that I could count on (coalition advocates) to get me
out, that I could call them and tell them.”
Discussion
After an extensive review of the literature on services
for sex trafficking victims, Macy and Johns (2011)
called for specific research on the needs of parents
who are sex trafficking victims. The results of the
current study provide insight into the experiences of
sex trafficking victims who are mothers. Our research
found that mothers who are sex trafficking victims
face many challenges in re-creating their lives after
being rescued and many of these challenges relate to
their roles as mothers in transnational families.
Overall, their experiences as mothers served as
inspiration that facilitated their emotional restoration.
Transnational Mothers
As there is so little research on sex trafficking victims
who are mothers, the research available on
transnational families is helpful in placing the
experiences of these mothers into a broader context.
Transnational families are families separated by
geographical borders (Orozco, 2006). The concept of
“transitional motherhood” in the context of gender,
political and social inequalities has been explored by
Parreñas (2001). Transnational mothers leave their
children behind in their country of origin and endure
a lengthy separation from their children to pursue
opportunities to strengthen the family
(Hondagneu-Sotelo & Avila, 1997; Parreñas, 2001;
Zontini, 2007). Transnational motherhood removes
mothers from their children’s daily activities and
thus, contradicts the normative role of mothers in the
United States (Hondagneu-Sotelo & Avila, 1997).
After a sex trafficking victim is rescued and the
element of exploitation is removed from her life, she
continues to struggle with the transnational
separation of her children and family.
The cause of separation that families endure in
transnational migration is similar to the causes of sex
traffickingeconomic and gender inequality.
Separations in transnational families cause immense
strain for both the mother and child (Foner & Dreby,
2011). Parenting and discipline issues are a struggle
for mothers who rely on family members to provide
the day-to-day care of their children (Dreby, 2010).
Children may demonstrate significant stress due to
the separation (Parreñas, 2005) and tend to do poorly
in school (Kandel & Massey, 2002). Even once these
families are reunited, there are long-term impacts on
the parent-child relationship (Foner & Dreby, 2011).
Parents, such as those in our study, may experience
feelings of guilt and worry about their child’s
acculturation into a new environment.
While the issues faced in transnational families
are similar to the experiences of sex trafficking
victims who have been rescued, family problems may
be exacerbated due to the mother’s trauma and lack
of acculturation. Although the women in our study
did not reveal specific instances of trauma impacting
motherhood, they did express fears about how their
lack of acculturation into the U.S. may impact their
effectiveness as parents. For instance, mothers
reported being worried about how their children
would adjust, where they would find resources for
their child, and how they would enroll their children
in school. Unlike other transnational mothers, sex
trafficking victims may not have the time in the U.S.
to get settled before their children join them.
Transnational Mothers as “Breadwinners
Regardless of whether or not the mothers in the
present study had been reunited with their children,
there was a clear sense that they felt responsibility for
providing for their children and families. Oftentimes,
families are separated by migration based on the idea
that the separation will ultimately have a positive
impact on their family (Dreby, 2010). In the case of
international sex trafficking victims, the desire for
economic stability may result in a young woman
trusting a trafficker. With the promise of providing
financially for their families lost during the
trafficking captivity, the victims appear to feel
enormous pressure to provide money for their
families.
After their rescue, and while they were still
separated, the mothers were remitters who regularly
sent money back home to their children and other
dependents. One mother even indicated that she
would go without food until she had sent money back
to her family. Her statement is consistent with
remittance literature which states that transnational
parents strive to meet all their children’s material
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
53
needs even if it means depriving themselves of food
(Abrego, 2009; Coe, 2008; Parreñas, 2001).
Once their children joined them in the United
States, mother’s concerns shifted to successfully
raising their children in a new environment. Like
many immigrant families, they desired to improve
their family through their child’s education (Dreby,
2010). While the mothers did have personal goals
such as finding and sustaining employment,
completing a GED, and learning English, their
primary focus was on the wellbeing and advancement
of their children.
Policy and Practice Implications
Despite the limitations of this study, the findings
support the idea that there are unique needs of
victims of international sex trafficking who are
mothers. The study of immigrant sex trafficking
victims who are mothers has important implications
for policy makers and volunteer organizations.
Victims of sex trafficking need a safe environment as
they have been subjected to extreme abuse, including
bondage, physical violence, sexual assault and rape,
and emotional abuse at the hands of the traffickers.
Safety, therefore, should be a primary concern with
regard to policies and assistance to victims of
trafficking.
While victims of sex trafficking may share many
of the challenges experienced by transnational
parents, they have unique needs based on their
trafficking experiences. As mothers, victims of
trafficking may be particularly concerned about the
protection of their families, health care, and day care
(Busch-Armendariz, Nsonwu & Heffron, 2011).
Policy makers must be aware that an immigrant
trafficking survivor does not exist in isolation.
Rather, she is likely a mother and a member of a
family that depends on her for financial support and
emotional guidance. Based on the difficulties of
separation, policy and practice should respond
quickly to reunite families both for safety and
emotional reasons.
While focus of research has been on the
immediate impact of trafficking, greater focus should
be on long-term copingthe experiences of
immigrant sex trafficking victims as they heal over
time. Greater understanding is also needed to explore
the experiences of their children as they reunite with
their mothers and what might be done to help their
extended families.
Received 1 March 2013; accepted 15 June, 2013; published
online 30 August 2013.
References
Abrego, L. (2009). Economic well-being in Salvadoran
transnational families: How gender affects remittance
practices. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1070-1085.
Aron, L. Y., Zweig, J. M., & Newmark, L. C. (2006).
Comprehensive services for survivors of human trafficking:
Findings from clients in three communities. The Urban
Institute, Washington, D.C.
Bales, K., & Lize S. (2005). Trafficking in Persons in the United
States. National Criminal Justice Publication No. 211980.
Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
Banks, D., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2011). Characteristics of Suspected
Human Trafficking Incidents, 2008-2010. Washington DC:
U.S. Department of Justice.
Barry, K. (1984). Female sexual slavery. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Bishop, C. (2003). The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of
2000: Three years later. International Migration, 4,
219-231.
Bishop, R., & Robinson, L. S. (1998). Night market: Sexual
cultures and the Thai economic miracle. NY: Routledge.
Brennan, D. (2005). Methodological challenges in research with
trafficked persons: tales from the field. International
Migration, 43, 35-54.
Busch, N. B., Fong, R., Heffron, L. C., Faulkner, M., &
Mahapatra, N. (2007). An Evaluation of the Central Texas
Coalition Against Human Trafficking. Austin, TX:
University of Texas at Austin, Institute on Domestic
Violence & Sexual Assault.
Busch-Armendariz, N. B. (2012). T Visas. In S. Loue, & M.
Sajatovic (Eds.). The encyclopedia of immigrant health.
NY: Springer.
Busch-Armendariz, N. B., Cook Heffron, L., Kalergis, K.,
Mahapatra, N., Faulkner, M., Voyles, L., et al. (2008).
Human trafficking in Texas; A statewide evaluation of
existing laws and social services. Austin, TX: University of
Texas at Austin, Institute on Domestic Violence & Sexual
Assault (IDVSA).
Busch-Armendariz, N. B., Nsonwu, M., & Cook Heffron, L. C.
(2011). Human trafficking victims and their children:
Assessing needs, vulnerabilities, strengths, and
survivorship. Journal of Applied Research on Children:
Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 2, 1-19.
Busch-Armendariz, N. B., Nswonu, M. B., Cook Heffron, L.,
Garza, J., & Hernandez, M. (October 2009). A Research
Study on Human Trafficking Victims: Survivors Speak Out
about Long-Term Needs!Austin, TX: University of Texas at
Austin, Institute on Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault
(IDVSA). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1aQNb1Q!
Busch Armendariz, N.B., Nsonwu, M., Cook Heffron, L., &
Mahapatra, N. (under review). Human trafficking:
Exploited labor. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
Social Work Online. New York City, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Clawson, H. J., Dutch, N., Salomon, A. & Grace, L. G. (2009).
Human trafficking into and within the United States: A
review of the literature. U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning
and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://1.usa.gov/16WJbLF
Clawson, H. J., Layne, M., & Small, K. (2006). Estimating human
trafficking into the United States: development of a
methodology. Fairfax. VA: Caliber. Retrieved from
http://1.usa.gov/13SUXUa
Clawson, H. J., Small, K. M., Go, E. S., & Myles, B. W. (2003).
Needs assessment for service providers and trafficking
victims (Publ. No. 202469). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Justice.
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
54
Coe, C. (2008). The structuring of feeling in Ghanian transnational
families. City & Society, 20, 222-250.
Decker M. R., Silverman J. G., & Raj, A. (2007). Sexual violence
against adolescent girls: Influences of immigration and
acculturation. Violence Against Women, 13, 498-513.
Dreby, J. (2010). Divided by Borders: Mexican Migrants and
Their Children. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Everts, D. (2003). Human Trafficking: The ruthless trade in
human misery. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10, 149.
Feingold, D. (2010). Trafficking in Numbers: The Social
Construction of Human Trafficking Data. In P. Andreas &
K. M. Greenhill (Eds.) Sex, Drugs and Body Counts: The
Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press.
Feingold, D. (2005). Human trafficking. Foreign Policy, 150,
26-32.
Flowers, R. B. (2001). The sex trade industry’s worldwide
exploitation of children. Annals of the American Academy
of Political and Social Science, 575, 147-157.
Foner, N., & Dreby, J. (2011). Relations between the generations
in immigrant families. Annual Review of Sociology, 37,
1-20.
Gilman, B. A. (2001). Implementation of the Trafficking Victims
Protection Act: Hearing before the Committee on
International Relations House of Representatives.
Statement of Congressman Gilman, 107
th
Congress.
Gozdziak, E. M., & Colette, E. A. (2005). Research on human
trafficking in North America: A review of literature.
International Migration, 43, 99-127.
Hodge, D. R. (2008). Sexual trafficking in the United States: A
domestic problem with transnational dimensions. Social
Work, 52, 143-152.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). ‘I’m here, but I’m
there’: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood.
Gender & Society, 11(5), 548-571.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to
qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,
15, 1277-1288.
Human Rights Watch. (1995). Rape for Profit: Trafficking of
Nepali Girls and Women to India’s Brothels. Retrieved
from http://bit.ly/cXbmfv
International Labour Office. (2005). A Global Alliance Against
Forced Labour. Geneva: International Labour Conference.
Kandel, W. & Massey, D. S. (2002). The culture of Mexican
migration: A theoretical and empirical analysis.
Sociological Forces, 80, 981-1005.
Kondrack, N. L., & Wellman, N. S. (2002). Content analysis:
Review of methods and their applications in nutrition
education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,
34, 224-230.
Laczko, F. (2005). Data and research on human trafficking.
International Migration, 43, 5-16.
Logan, T.K., Walker, R., & Hunt, G. (2009). Understanding
human trafficking in the United States. Trauma, Violence
and Abuse, 10, 3-30.
Macy, R. J., & Johns, N. (2011). Aftercare services for
international sex trafficking survivors: informing U.S.
services and program development in an emerging practice
area. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 12, 87-98.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum:
Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
McDonald, R. R. (1998). Atlanta House Linked to Prostitution
Ring; FBI: Asian Girls Used as Sex Slaves. Atlanta Journal
- Constitution, 6F.
Mizus, M., Moody, M., Privado, C., & Douglas, C. A. (2003).
Germany, U.S. receive most sex-trafficked women. Off Our
Backs, 33, 4.
Orozco, M. (2006). Transnational families: Lives on the edge, but
in pursuit of change. Retrieved from
http://bit.ly/11BQMLO
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization. Women,
migration, and domestic work. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of Global Migration:
Transnational Families and Gender Woes. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Raymond, J. G., & Hughes, D. M. (2001). Sex trafficking of
women in the United States: International and domestic
trends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Retrieved from http://1.usa.gov/11mRtdr
Raymond, J. G., Hughes, D. M., & Gomez, C. J. (2001). Sex
trafficking of women in the United States. New York:
Coalition Against Trafficking in Women.
Schauer, E. J., & Wheaton, E. M. (2006). Sex trafficking into the
United States: A literature review. Criminal Justice Review,
31, 146-169.
Shigekane, R. (2007). Rehabilitation and community integration of
trafficking survivors in the United States. Human Rights
Quarterly, 29, 112-136.
Spear, D. L. (2004). Human trafficking: A health care perspective.
Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal
Nurses Lifelines, 8, 314-321.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and
software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
The Florida State University Center for the Advancement of
Human Rights (2003). Florida responds to human
trafficking. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/12AmjBd
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (2000): (Public Law 106-386).
Tyldum, G., & Brunovskis, A. (2005). Describing the unobserved:
Methodological challenges in empirical studies on human
trafficking. International Migration, 43, 18-34.
United Nations (2002). The United Nations response to trafficking
in women and girls. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/Z7AXvp
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Fact
Sheet: Sex Trafficking. Washington D.C.: Administration
for Children and Families. Retrieved from
http://1.usa.gov/dawhDZ
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Trafficking in personsA
guide for non-governmental organizations. Retrieved from
http://1.usa.gov/bIFvt
U.S. Department of State. (2006). Trafficking in persons report.
Washington, D.C..
U.S. Department of State. (2008). Trafficking in persons report.
Washington, D.C..
U.S. Department of State. (2010). Trafficking in persons report.
Washington, D.C..
U.S. Department of State. (2011). Trafficking in persons report.
Washington, D.C..
U.S. Department of State. (2012). Trafficking in persons report.
Washington, D.C.Office Monitor and Combat Trafficking
in Persons.
Weaver, A. J., Flannelly, L. T., Garbarino, J., Figley, C. R., &
Flannelly, K. J. (2003). A systematic review of research on
religion and spirituality in the Journal of Traumatic Stress:
1990-1999; Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 6, 215228.
West, C. M. (2006). Sexual Violence in the Lives of African
American Women: Risk, Response, and Resilience.
U.S.National Online Resource Center on Violence Against
Women. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/18r56Zu
World Health Organization. (2000). Violence against women and
HIV/AIDS: Setting the research agenda. Retrieved from
http://bit.ly/11tJHtr
Zhang, Sheldon X. (2009). “Beyond the 'Natasha' story: A Review
and Critique of Current Research on Sex Trafficking.”
Global Crime 10(3): 178-195.
Zontini, E. (2007). Transnational Families 2007. U. S. Sloan Work
& Family Research Network, Boston College. Retrieved
from http://bit.ly/111eqRH
Faulkner et al. / International Perspectives in Victimology 7 (2), 46-55
The Press
55
Additional information
Throughout this manuscript, survivors of human trafficking may be
referred to simply as “victims” for narrative efficiency and in
recognition of their crime victimization. However, it should be
noted that all victims of human trafficking have survived a
horrifying combination of physical and emotional abuse, trauma,
and financial distress. The term victim is not meant in any way to
be demeaning or judgmental nor is it meant to label these women.
We honor the journey that each woman has made and how she
chooses to speak about it.
CopyrightofInternationalPerspectivesinVictimologyisthepropertyofCaliforniaState
University,Fresnoanditscontentmaynotbecopiedoremailedtomultiplesitesorpostedto
alistservwithoutthecopyrightholder'sexpresswrittenpermission.However,usersmay
print,download,oremailarticlesforindividualuse.